IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i4p6215-6227.html

Environmental Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of ESG‐Executive Compensation

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Dohrmann
  • Monica Martinez‐Blasco
  • Jordi Cuadros
  • Francesc Prior Sanz

Abstract

This paper examines the moderating role of executive compensation tied to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics in the relationship between environmental performance and firm value. Data from 586 publicly listed European firms across various industries between 2016 and 2021 were analyzed using OLS regression and a series of robustness checks. Findings reveal a significant positive relationship between environmental performance and firm value within these firms. Furthermore, empirical evidence is provided proving that this relationship is strengthened when executive compensation is linked to ESG metrics. To enhance the robustness of the results, lagged variables of Tobin's Q and the generalized method of moments (GMM) were employed. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, firms, and stakeholders regarding the strategic benefits of aligning executive compensation with ESG objectives, ultimately fostering improved environmental performance and greater firm value.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Dohrmann & Monica Martinez‐Blasco & Jordi Cuadros & Francesc Prior Sanz, 2025. "Environmental Performance and Firm Value: The Moderating Role of ESG‐Executive Compensation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6215-6227, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6215-6227
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3454
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omar Farooque & Wonlop Buachoom & Nam Hoang, 2019. "Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1111-1164, December.
    2. Ki‐Hoon Lee & Beom Cheol Cin & Eui Young Lee, 2016. "Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 40-53, January.
    3. Hoje Jo & Maretno Harjoto, 2011. "Corporate Governance and Firm Value: The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 351-383, October.
    4. Ben Lahouel, Béchir & Bruna, Maria-Giuseppina & Ben Zaied, Younes, 2020. "The curvilinear relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: An investigation of listed french firms using panel smooth transition model," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    5. Lucy W. Lu, 2021. "The moderating effect of corporate governance on the relationship between corporate sustainability performance and corporate financial performance," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 193-206, September.
    6. Paul Lanoie, 2008. "When And Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Papers 2008n-02a, CIRANO.
    7. Cortez, Maria Céu & Andrade, Nuno & Silva, Florinda, 2022. "The environmental and financial performance of green energy investments: European evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Chen, Yufeng & Ma, Yanbai, 2021. "Does green investment improve energy firm performance?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    9. Amery Wu & Bruno Zumbo, 2008. "Understanding and Using Mediators and Moderators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 367-392, July.
    10. Collins G. Ntim & Sarah Lindop & Kofi A. Osei & Dennis A. Thomas, 2015. "Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance: A Simultaneous Equation Approach," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), pages 67-96, March.
    11. Haque, Faizul, 2017. "The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 347-364.
    12. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    13. Yasir Shahab & Collins G. Ntim & Yugang Chen & Farid Ullah & Hai‐Xia Li & Zhiwei Ye, 2020. "Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 1-16, January.
    14. Shira Cohen & Igor Kadach & Gaizka Ormazabal & Stefan Reichelstein, 2023. "Executive Compensation Tied to ESG Performance: International Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(3), pages 805-853, June.
    15. Hoje Jo & Hakkon Kim & Kwangwoo Park, 2015. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance in the Financial Services Sector," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 257-284, October.
    16. Caroline Flammer & Bryan Hong & Dylan Minor, 2019. "Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation: Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1097-1122, July.
    17. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    18. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Giaka, Maria & Konstantios, Dimitrios & Patsika, Victoria, 2023. "Firms’ sustainability, financial performance, and regulatory dynamics: Evidence from European firms," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    19. Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2015. "Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 50(2), pages 420-445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammad H. Alzyod & Collins G. Ntim & John K. Malagila & Mahmoud Al‐Sayed & Mohammed A. Alhossini, 2025. "Carbon Performance and Executive Compensation: The Moderating Role of Governance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8358-8389, November.
    2. Sisi Zheng & Shanyue Jin, 2023. "Can Enterprises in China Achieve Sustainable Development through Green Investment?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Dallocchio, Maurizio & Pistolesi, Francesco & Teti, Emanuele, 2025. "Conciliating environmental and financial performance in emerging countries," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    4. Patrick Velte, 2024. "Archival research on sustainability‐related executive compensation. A literature review of the status quo and future improvements," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3119-3147, July.
    5. Zhang, Dayong & Zhang, Zhiwei & Ji, Qiang & Lucey, Brian & Liu, Jia, 2021. "Board characteristics, external governance and the use of renewable energy: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    6. Balaji, Pavithra & Qian, Cuili & Khoo, Eunice S. & Lu, Louise Y., 2025. "CEO financial distress experience and CSR: A contingency perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    7. Peng, Shengnan & Liu, Chan & Wang, Ze & Ye, Zihan & Sun, Xialing & Tan, Zhanglu, 2024. "The impact of the carbon reduction policy effectiveness on energy companies' ESG performance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    8. Hsuan‐Lien Chu & Nai‐Yng Liu & Albert Tsang & Xiao Zeng, 2025. "Environmental Risk, Environmental Action, and Firm Value: Evidence From Climate‐Linked Contracts," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 35(3), pages 215-240, September.
    9. Hou, Shilin & Shen, Jianfeng & Yu, Chuan & Zhou, Shan, 2025. "Reprint of: Heterogeneity in the integration of ESG measures in executive compensation: Determinants, contracting details and outcomes," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(1).
    10. Junnan Hu & Shujing Wang & Feixue Xie, 2018. "Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: Evidence from China," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1376-1387, November.
    11. Douglas A. Adu & Basil Al‐Najjar & Thitima Sitthipongpanich, 2022. "Executive compensation, environmental performance, and sustainable banking: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1439-1463, May.
    12. Shaoyu Li & Zihao Qu & Xian Wang & Chunhui Zhu, 2025. "Does Managerial Stock‐Based Compensation Improve Chinese Manufacturing Firms' Carbon Performance? Regulating Preferences and Climate Risk Exposure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 65(4), pages 3923-3945, December.
    13. Nurlan Orazalin & Mady Baydauletov, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1664-1676, July.
    14. Mariann Veresné Somosi & Krisztina Varga & György Kocziszky, 2019. "Step by Step for Social Innovation with Neuro-Fuzzy Modelling," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 5, ejes_v5_i.
    15. Wei Peng & Baogui Xin & Yekyung Kwon, 2019. "Optimal Strategies of Product Price, Quality, and Corporate Environmental Responsibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-24, November.
    16. Yu Wang & Yetaotao Qiu & Yi Luo, 2022. "CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2036-2051, July.
    17. Yuxuan Li & Xin Miao & Dequan Zheng & Yanhong Tang, 2019. "Corporate Public Transparency on Financial Performance: The Moderating Role of Political Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Liu, Simeng & Wang, Kun Tracy & Walpola, Sonali & Zhu, Nathan Zhenghang, 2024. "CSR contracting and stock price crash risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    19. Muhammad Ali & Mirit K Grabarski & Sana Ahmed & Nazish Imtiaz, 2024. "Does leadership gender diversity drive corporate social responsibility and organizational outcomes? The role of organization size," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(3), pages 319-339, August.
    20. Dewan Muktadir‐Al‐Mukit & Firoz Haroon Bhaiyat, 2024. "Impact of corporate governance diversity on carbon emission under environmental policy via the mandatory nonfinancial reporting regulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1397-1417, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6215-6227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.