IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i4p6198-6214.html

Technological Innovation and Sustainability: Do Homegrown Innovations Foster Greater Ecological Sensitivity? Simulation‐Based Insights From South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Ping Dong
  • Chinazaekpere Nwani
  • Festus Victor Bekun

Abstract

Environmental sustainability remains a critical challenge, particularly for economies with high resource dependence and energy‐intensive industries like South Africa. Technological innovation is often regarded as a pathway to ecological resilience, yet its effectiveness may be shaped by its origin—domestic or foreign. Understanding these distinctions is crucial, as different types of innovations may have varying impacts on sustainability, influencing the design of effective policy interventions. This study investigates the role of resident (domestic) and non‐resident (foreign) technological innovations in shaping ecological load (EL) capacity in South Africa, while also considering the impact of economic affluence and energy consumption. Using data from 1981 to 2021, the study applies dynamic simulations of autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) models and Kernel‐based Regularized Least Squares. The results reveal that resident innovations significantly enhance EL, with a 1% increase in Patent Applications by Residents (PR) improving EL by 0.033% in the long run. Conversely, non‐resident innovations have an insignificant effect. Additionally, economic affluence exerts a negative impact, with a 1% increase in income reducing EL by 0.61%, while energy consumption also contributes to ecological strain. These findings indicate that homegrown innovations play a crucial role in strengthening ecological resilience, whereas reliance on foreign technologies may not effectively address local environmental challenges. Policymakers should prioritize investments in domestic research and development and support technology localization strategies to enhance the relevance of foreign innovations. Strengthening local innovation ecosystems and integrating sustainability‐driven technological policies are essential steps toward achieving long‐term ecological resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Ping Dong & Chinazaekpere Nwani & Festus Victor Bekun, 2025. "Technological Innovation and Sustainability: Do Homegrown Innovations Foster Greater Ecological Sensitivity? Simulation‐Based Insights From South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(4), pages 6198-6214, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6198-6214
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3453
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hainmueller, Jens & Hazlett, Chad, 2014. "Kernel Regularized Least Squares: Reducing Misspecification Bias with a Flexible and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 143-168, April.
    2. Xu, Li & Wang, Xiuli & Wang, Lijun & Zhang, Di, 2022. "Does technological advancement impede ecological footprint level? The role of natural resources prices volatility, foreign direct investment and renewable energy in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Bekun, Festus Victor, 2024. "Race to carbon neutrality in South Africa: What role does environmental technological innovation play?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PA).
    4. M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin & Richard J. Smith, 2001. "Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(3), pages 289-326.
    5. Adewale Samuel Hassan, 2023. "Modeling the linkage between coal mining and ecological footprint in South Africa: does technological innovation matter?," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(1), pages 123-138, January.
    6. Liddle, Brantley, 2015. "What Are the Carbon Emissions Elasticities for Income and Population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates," MPRA Paper 61304, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2023. "Environmental sustainability in South Africa: Understanding the criticality of economic policy uncertainty, fiscal decentralization, and green innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1638-1651, June.
    8. Bashir, Muhammad Adnan & Dengfeng, Zhao & Filipiak, Beata Zofia & Bilan, Yuriy & Vasa, László, 2023. "Role of economic complexity and technological innovation for ecological footprint in newly industrialized countries: Does geothermal energy consumption matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    9. Sinan Erdogan, 2024. "Linking natural resources and environmental sustainability: A panel data approach based on the load capacity curve hypothesis," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 3182-3194, August.
    10. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Nicholas Ngepah, 2024. "A roadmap to a green economy in South Africa: modelling technological innovation and energy consumption in the novel dynamic ARDL simulations framework," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2295191-229, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuyuan Guan & Paul David, 2026. "Bridging Innovation Gaps for the SDGs: A Quantile Analysis of Technology Drivers in Intercontinental Emerging Economies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 1566-1581, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deka, Abraham & Efe-Onakpojeruo, Chioma Christiana & Ozdeser, Huseyin, 2025. "Capitalizing on technological innovations and natural resources rent in alleviating ecological footprint in the Sub-Saharan African countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Nwani, Chinazaekpere & Omoke, Philip Chimobi, 2025. "Towards an ecologically sustainable electricity mix in South Africa: Evaluating the policy implications of renewable and nuclear energy," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    3. Yu, Donglei & Wenhui, Xiong & Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Imran, Muhammad & Zaman, Khalid & Haffar, Mohamed, 2023. "Navigating the global mineral market: A study of resource wealth and the energy transition," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Ullah, Sami & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Harnessing the synergistic impacts of financial structure, industrialization, and ecological footprint through the lens of the EKC hypothesis. Insights from Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Chindo Sulaiman & A. S. Abdul-Rahim, 2018. "Population Growth and CO2 Emission in Nigeria: A Recursive ARDL Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, April.
    6. Roy, Arup, 2023. "Nexus between economic growth, external debt, oil price, and remittances in India: New insight from novel DARDL simulations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Xiaohua Sun & Danish Khan & Yubai Zheng, 2024. "Articulating the Role of Technological Innovation and Policy Uncertainty in Energy Efficiency: an Empirical Investigation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14597-14616, September.
    8. Roy, Arup, 2024. "Impacts of economic development, globalization, and gross capital formation on natural resources rents: Evidence from India," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    9. Lars Sorge & Anne Neumann, 2019. "The Impact of Population, Affluence, Technology, and Urbanization on CO2 Emissions across Income Groups," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1812, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Ali Çelik & Metehan Özırmak, 2025. "Understanding the Association Between Bitcoin Mining and Environmental Sustainability in Light of the Sustainable Development Goals Through the DARDL and KRLS Methods," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 6505-6527, October.
    11. Haoran Zhao & Sen Guo & Huiru Zhao, 2018. "Characterizing the Influences of Economic Development, Energy Consumption, Urbanization, Industrialization, and Vehicles Amount on PM 2.5 Concentrations of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Carlo Andrea Bollino & Marzio Galeotti, 2025. "Native-borns and migrants do not contribute equally to domestic CO2 emissions," Working Papers 2025.17, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Schneider, Nicolas & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2023. "Modelling the unit root properties of electricity data—A general note on time-domain applications," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    14. Zhou, Runyu & Abbasi, Kashif Raza & Salem, Sultan & Almulhim, Abdulaziz.I. & Alvarado, Rafael, 2022. "Do natural resources, economic growth, human capital, and urbanization affect the ecological footprint? A modified dynamic ARDL and KRLS approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    15. Seker, Fahri & Ertugrul, Hasan Murat & Cetin, Murat, 2015. "The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 347-356.
    16. He, Yugang, 2026. "Reconfiguring Korea’s dual transition: Empirical insights on the role of industry 4.0 technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Oktay Özkan & Hephzibah Onyeje Obekpa & Andrew Adewale Alola, 2025. "Examining the nexus of energy intensity, renewables, natural resources, and carbon intensity in India," Energy & Environment, , vol. 36(1), pages 168-186, February.
    18. Abul Hassan & Ridwan Lanre Ibrahim, 2025. "Driving Toward Carbon Neutrality in United States: Do Artificial Intelligence Shocks, Energy Policy Uncertainty, Green Growth, and Regulatory Quality Matter?," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    19. Caravaggio, Nicola, 2020. "A global empirical re-assessment of the Environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Kartal, Mustafa Tevfik & Pata, Ugur Korkut & Kılıç Depren, Serpil & Depren, Özer, 2023. "Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Evidence from France under Russia’s gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:6198-6214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.