IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v27y2019i1p50-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply chain strategy decisions for sustainable development using an integrated multi‐criteria decision‐making approach

Author

Listed:
  • V. Sreekumar
  • M. Rajmohan

Abstract

The evaluation and selection of strategies for sustainable development in manufacturing supply chains are critical tasks for the decision‐maker because of the complexity involving various criteria. This paper deals with the prioritization of critical sustainability criteria and the sustainability strategy selection (SSS) using an integrated weighting approach. This approach consists of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the subjective and objective weight integrated approach (SOWIA) and the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and is found to be effective for solving this multi‐criteria decision‐making problem. The proposed methodology is applied to solve a real‐time supply chain decision‐making issue of an Indian manufacturing industry. From a sustainability perspective, the results indicate the second strategy set as the best among the given alternatives, with an objective factor of 0.5. The robustness of the results has been analysed to identify the uncertainty in the final ranking. The consistency of the final ranking has been evaluated based on different objective factor values. The novelty of this paper pertains to addressing the most relevant SSS problem involved in a manufacturing supply chain and in establishing a hybrid approach for solving it. This approach offers a flexible provision for decision‐makers to incorporate the appropriate level of subjectivity and objectivity into their decisions based on their degree of expertise. This study is unique and carries a high originality value, as it offers a new structured and flexible approach to solving the SSS problem.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Sreekumar & M. Rajmohan, 2019. "Supply chain strategy decisions for sustainable development using an integrated multi‐criteria decision‐making approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 50-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:50-60
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.1861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1861
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.1861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shouzhen Zeng & Yingjie Hu & Tomas Balezentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2020. "A multi‐criteria sustainable supplier selection framework based on neutrosophic fuzzy data and entropy weighting," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1431-1440, September.
    2. Aquib Irteza Reshad & Tasnia Biswas & Renu Agarwal & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem, 2023. "Evaluating barriers and strategies to sustainable supply chain risk management in the context of an emerging economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4315-4334, November.
    3. Ardian Qorri & Saranda Gashi & Andrzej Kraslawski, 2021. "Performance outcomes of supply chain practices for sustainable development: A meta‐analysis of moderators," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 194-216, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:27:y:2019:i:1:p:50-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.