IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2026i4p935-955.html

The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement

Author

Listed:
  • Brianna Felegi

Abstract

Before 2020, around 250 four‐year colleges and universities adopted a test‐optional application procedure that allowed students to apply for admission without submitting college entrance exam score. Many schools adopted this procedure to encourage greater racial and socioeconomic diversity. Unfortunately, we know little about the impact of these policies. In this paper, I use a difference‐in‐differences design to examine the impact of this reform on schools that adopted the policy between 2006 and 2014. Compared to schools that did not switch, test‐optional schools witnessed around a 15% increase in the enrollment of Black, Native American/Alaskan Native, and Hispanic students and around a 7% increase in the number of Pell Grant students. I also show that after switching, schools experienced an increase in the number of students receiving institutional grant aid, but decreases in the average aid granted. Institutions interested in adopting these policies should consider these possible unintended consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Brianna Felegi, 2026. "The Impacts of Removing College Entrance Exams: Evidence From the Test‐Optional Movement," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(4), pages 935-955, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:4:p:935-955
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.70028
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:4:p:935-955. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.