IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2026i4p878-896.html

Welfare Access and Inactivity Gaps: Revisiting the Racial Divergence in Unemployment Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Gonzalo Dona
  • Rene Zamarripa

Abstract

This paper examines the divergence in unemployment rates between Black and White men in the United States that emerged after 1930. We argue that labor force participation can serve as a proxy for studying unemployment trends among men aged 25 to 54, helping to address limitations in historical data. Using U.S. Census data, we revisit conventional explanations, such as the Great Migration and the Great Depression, and show that these events do not appear to, by themselves, fully account for the growing racial gap in inactivity and unemployment rates. Instead, we present empirical evidence suggesting that welfare incentives, particularly those associated with the New Deal relief programs, may offer an additional perspective on the observed patterns. By encouraging welfare migration, relief programs may have contributed to the long‐term racial divergence in unemployment rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalo Dona & Rene Zamarripa, 2026. "Welfare Access and Inactivity Gaps: Revisiting the Racial Divergence in Unemployment Rates," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(4), pages 878-896, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:4:p:878-896
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.70035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.70035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.70035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:4:p:878-896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.