IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2026i3p838-855.html

The Inexhaustible Mine?

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel F. Benzecry
  • Daniel J. Smith

Abstract

Why study the history of economic thought (HET)? We offer two novel contributions to the literature justifying HET. First, we provide a broad survey of the historical and contemporary justifications for HET, distilling three central categories of arguments: (1) HET fosters economic research, (2) it is useful for understanding the sociology of the organization and evolution of economics, and (3) it helps economists serve as more effective public intellectuals. Second, we address the critique of HET that it is akin to prospecting a stripped mine whose valuable insights have long since been extracted and incorporated into modern research. We argue that the notion of diminishing returns to HET applies only in a narrow, Malthusian sense. Economists are not uniform inputs, technological advances have lowered the costs of studying HET, and the field continues to grow as new influences on key thinkers emerge and economic thought evolves. Far from exhaustion, our survey and extension demonstrate that HET remains a productive resource for economists.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel F. Benzecry & Daniel J. Smith, 2026. "The Inexhaustible Mine?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(3), pages 838-855, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:3:p:838-855
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.70002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Albrecht & Omar Al-Ubaydli & Peter Boettke, 2022. "Testing the Hayek hypothesis: Recent theoretical and experimental evidence," Artefactual Field Experiments 00759, The Field Experiments Website.
    2. Vincent J. Tarascio, 1971. "Some Recent Developments in the History of Economic Thought in the United States," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 419-431, Fall.
    3. Vaughn, Karen I., 1993. "Why Teach the History of Economics?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 174-183, October.
    4. Benzecry, Gabriel F. & Jensen, Nicholas & Smith, Daniel J., 2025. "The Socialists’ Hypotheses And The Road To Serfdom," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(3), pages 291-316, September.
    5. Mark Blaug, 1990. "Economic Theories, True or False?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 49.
    6. Alan Freeman & Victoria Chick & Serap Kayatekin, 2014. "Samuelson’s ghosts: Whig history and the reinterpretation of economic theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 519-529.
    7. Amiya Kumar Bagchi, 2014. "Contextual political economy, not Whig economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 545-562.
    8. Daniel J. Smith, 2023. "Austrian economics as a relevant research program," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 36(4), pages 501-514, December.
    9. Pol Antràs & Vitalii Tubdenov, 2025. "Measuring the Average Period of Production," NBER Working Papers 33499, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Yuichi Shionoya, 2009. "The history of economics as economics?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 575-597.
    11. N. Gregory Mankiw, 2024. "Panel Discussion: Six Beliefs I Have About Inflation," NBER Chapters, in: Inflation in the COVID Era and Beyond, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Leeson, Peter T., 2020. "Economics is not statistics (and vice versa)," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(4), pages 423-425, August.
    13. María Victoria Anauati & Sebastian Galiani & Ramiro H. Gálvez, 2020. "Differences In Citation Patterns Across Journal Tiers: The Case Of Economics," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 58(3), pages 1217-1232, July.
    14. Peter J. Boettke & Christopher J. Coyne & Peter T. Leeson, 2014. "Earw(h)ig: I can’t hear you because your ideas are old," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(3), pages 531-544.
    15. Caplan, B., 2002. "How does war shock the economy?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 145-162, April.
    16. Barber, William J., 1967. "A History of Economic Thought," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number barber1967.
    17. Matthew C McCaffrey & Joseph T Salerno & Carmen Elena Dorobat, 2025. "The history of economic thought as a living laboratory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 49(2), pages 235-253.
    18. Daniel S. Hamermesh, 2018. "Citations in Economics: Measurement, Uses, and Impacts," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(1), pages 115-156, March.
    19. Pol Antràs & Vitalii Tubdenov, 2025. "Measuring the Average Period of Production," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 115, pages 624-630, May.
    20. Omar Al-Ubaydli & Peter Boettke & Brian C Albrecht, 2022. "Testing the Hayek hypothesis: Recent theoretical and experimental evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-25, July.
    21. Art Carden & Vincent Geloso & Phillip W. Magness, 2022. "Situating Southern Influences in James M. Buchanan and Modern Public Choice Economics," Studies in Economic History, in: Patrick Gray & Joshua Hall & Ruth Wallis Herndon & Javier Silvestre (ed.), Standard of Living, chapter 0, pages 465-475, Springer.
    22. repec:ejw:journl:v:2:y:2005:i:1:p:1-21 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Heinz Kurz, 2006. "Whither the history of economic thought? Going nowhere rather slowly?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 463-488.
    24. Kenneth E. Boulding, 1971. "After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 225-237, Fall.
    25. Bruce Caldwell, 2013. "Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(4), pages 753-767, April.
    26. Paul M. Romer, 2015. "Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 89-93, May.
    27. Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1996. "Nobel Lecture: Monetary Neutrality," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(4), pages 661-682, August.
    28. David Colander, 2005. "The Making of an Economist Redux," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 175-198, Winter.
    29. George J. Stigler, 1969. "Does Economics Have a Useful Past?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 217-230, Fall.
    30. Bernard A. Corry, 1975. "Should Economists Abandon HOPE?," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 252-260, Summer.
    31. Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, 2016. "“Adam Smith did Humanomics: So Should We”," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 42(4), pages 503-513, September.
    32. Ted Gayer, 2002. "Graduate Studies in the History of Economic Thought," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(5), pages 35-61, Supplemen.
    33. Martin, Christopher, 2021. "Adam Smith and the poor: A textual analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 837-849.
    34. Gordon F. Davis, 2003. "Philosophical Psychology and Economic Psychology in David Hume and Adam Smith," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 35(2), pages 269-304, Summer.
    35. Steven Kates, 2013. "Defending the History of Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13729.
    36. Gordon Tullock, 1999. "How To Do Well While Doing Good!," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Daniel B. Klein (ed.), What do Economists Contribute?, chapter 6, pages 87-103, Palgrave Macmillan.
    37. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 145-164, Winter.
    38. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists: Response," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(4), pages 222-222, Fall.
    39. Edwin G. West, 1990. "Adam Smith and Modern Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 466.
    40. Filippo Cesarano, 1983. "On the role of the history of economic analysis," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 63-82, Spring.
    41. Vernon L. Smith, 2003. "Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 465-508, June.
    42. Craufurd D. Goodwin, 2002. "The Future of Publication in the History of Economic Thought: The View from HOPE," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 34(5), pages 179-189, Supplemen.
    43. Donald McCloskey, 1994. "How economists persuade," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 15-32.
    44. Gabriel F. Benzecry & Nicholas A. Reinarts & Daniel J. Smith, 2025. "You have nothing to lose but your chains?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 202(3), pages 529-556, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 145-164, Winter.
    2. André Lapidus, 2016. "Pourquoi l'histoire de la pensée économique est-elle différente des autres histoires ? [Почему История Экономической Мысли Отличается От Других Историй?]," Post-Print hal-01619020, HAL.
    3. A. Maltsev., 2015. "History of Economic Thought, Quo vadis?," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 3.
    4. Eduardo Angeli, 2018. "Caminhos da Escola Austríaca: relação com ortodoxia, engajamento e produção de novo conhecimento [Paths of the Austrian School: its relationship with orthodoxy, engagement and production of new knowledge]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 28(2), pages 681-704, May-Augus.
    5. Bruce Caldwell, 2013. "Of Positivism and the History of Economic Thought," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(4), pages 753-767, April.
    6. Dieter Bögenhold, 2020. "History of Economic Thought as an Analytic Tool: why Past Intellectual Ideas Must Be Acknowledged as Lighthouses for the Future," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 26(1), pages 73-87, February.
    7. Csaba, László, 2018. "Az intézményi gazdaságtan és a főáram [Institutional economics and the mainstream]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 1-23.
    8. André Lapidus, 2019. "Bringing them alive," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(6), pages 1084-1106, November.
    9. Simon Bilo, 2018. "Lucas and Hume on Monetary Non-neutrality: A Tension between the Logic and the Technique of Economics," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(3), pages 364-380, June.
    10. Hendrik P. van Dalen, 2019. "Values of Economists Matter in the Art and Science of Economics," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(3), pages 472-499, August.
    11. Jakob Kapeller & Stephan Puehringer & Christian Grimm, 2022. "Paradigms and policies: the state of economics in the German-speaking countries," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 1183-1210, July.
    12. Michel Herland, 1992. "À quoi sert l'histoire de la pensée économique ?," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 43(5), pages 953-960.
    13. Avi J. Cohen & Ross B. Emmett, 2011. "Why and How to Teach the History of Economic Thought: Economics as Historically Produced Knowledge," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 52, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Anthony Brewer, 2012. "Mark Blaug, 1927--2011," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 475-480, June.
    15. Harro Maas, 2013. "A 2 x 2 = 4 hobby horse: Mark Blaug on rational and historical reconstructions," Chapters, in: Marcel Boumans & Matthias Klaes (ed.), Mark Blaug: Rebel with Many Causes, chapter 10, pages 125-145, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Gabriel F. Benzecry & Daniel J. Smith, 2024. "The wisdom of classical political economy in economics: incorporated or lost?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(2), pages 133-152, June.
    17. Marcus Shera & Kacey Reeves West, 2024. "Two worlds collide: A review essay of Humanomics: moral sentiments and the wealth of nations for the twenty-first century," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 37(3), pages 333-349, September.
    18. Andrea Maneschi, 2000. "How New is the "New Trade Theory" of the Past Two Decades?," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0027, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    19. Wilfred Dolfsma & Patrick J. Welch, 2009. "Paradigms and Novelty in Economics: The History of Economic Thought as a Source of Enlightenment," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(5), pages 1085-1106, November.
    20. Syed Hasan & Robert Breunig, 2021. "Article length and citation outcomes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(9), pages 7583-7608, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2026:i:3:p:838-855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.