IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2025i2p637-661.html

Sentiment Analysis of Teaching Evaluations: Evidence From Nearly 8 Million Rate My Professor Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Jose M. Fernandez
  • Erin Yetter

Abstract

Student‐driven teaching evaluations are commonly used in faculty assessments but are known to exhibit gender and racial biases. Despite this, some argue that student comments provide meaningful feedback. Using over 8 million reviews from RateMyProfessors.com, we apply sentiment analysis to evaluate bias in student comments. We find that while comments exhibit similar biases as numerical scores, the effects are more muted. On average, numerical ratings are 2% lower for female instructors and 6% lower for minority instructors. Sentiment scores are 2% lower for female instructors and 3.6%–8.6% lower for minority instructors. These penalties increase with course difficulty but do not vary by institution type. In economics departments, numerical ratings are lower for female and minority instructors; these differences remain statistically significant when sentiment scores are considered. Importantly, nearly 30% of the variation in evaluation scores can be explained by student sentiment, highlighting the influence of subjective language.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose M. Fernandez & Erin Yetter, 2025. "Sentiment Analysis of Teaching Evaluations: Evidence From Nearly 8 Million Rate My Professor Reviews," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(2), pages 637-661, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:2:p:637-661
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12787
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamermesh, Daniel S. & Parker, Amy, 2005. "Beauty in the classroom: instructors' pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 369-376, August.
    2. Braga, Michela & Paccagnella, Marco & Pellizzari, Michele, 2014. "Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 71-88.
    3. Anna Stansbury & Robert Schultz, 2023. "The Economics Profession's Socioeconomic Diversity Problem," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 207-230, Fall.
    4. Pongsak Luangaram & Yuthana Sethapramote, 2016. "Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 20., Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research, revised Feb 2016.
    5. Gary A. Hoover & Ebonya Washington, 2022. "Report: Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economics Profession (CSMGEP)," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 112, pages 768-785, May.
    6. Matthew Gentzkow & Jesse M. Shapiro, 2010. "What Drives Media Slant? Evidence From U.S. Daily Newspapers," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 35-71, January.
    7. James J. Heckman & Sidharth Moktan, 2020. "Publishing and Promotion in Economics: The Tyranny of the Top Five," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(2), pages 419-470, June.
    8. Boring, Anne & Philippe, Arnaud, 2021. "Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Jose M. Fernandez & Erin A. Yetter & Kim Holder, 2021. "What do economic education scholars study? Insights from machine learning," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(2), pages 156-172, March.
    10. Peyman Heydarian & Albert Bifet & Shaen Corbet, 2025. "Understanding market sentiment analysis: A survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 1125-1147, July.
    11. James F. Ragan & Bhavneet Walia, 2010. "Differences in Student Evaluations of Principles and Other Economics Courses and the Allocation of Faculty across Courses," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 335-352, September.
    12. Wagner, N. & Rieger, M. & Voorvelt, K.J., 2016. "Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations : Evidence from mixed teaching teams," ISS Working Papers - General Series 617, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    13. Scott E. Carrell & James E. West, 2010. "Does Professor Quality Matter? Evidence from Random Assignment of Students to Professors," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 118(3), pages 409-432, June.
    14. William E. Becker, 2000. "Teaching Economics in the 21st Century," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 109-119, Winter.
    15. Pongsak Luangaram & Yuthana Sethapramote, 2016. "Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 20, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    16. Maia Linask & James Monks, 2018. "Measuring faculty teaching effectiveness using conditional fixed effects," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(4), pages 324-339, October.
    17. Boring, Anne, 2017. "Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 27-41.
    18. Rieger, Matthias & Voorvelt, Katherine, 2016. "Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations: Evidence from mixed teaching teamsAuthor-Name: Wagner, Natascha," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 79-94.
    19. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    20. Xiang Zheng & Shreyas Vastrad & Jibo He & Chaoqun Ni, 2023. "Contextualizing gender disparities in online teaching evaluations for professors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, March.
    21. Selin Duz Tan & Oktay Tas, 2021. "Social Media Sentiment in International Stock Returns and Trading Activity," Journal of Behavioral Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 221-234, April.
    22. Judy Chevalier, 2021. "Report: Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession (CSWEP)," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 742-763, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bertoni, Marco & Rettore, Enrico & Rocco, Lorenzo, 2024. "If (my) 6 was (your) 9. Reporting heterogeneity in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. Robert L. Moore & Hanna Song & James D. Whitney, 2021. "Do Students Discriminate? Exploring Differentials by Race and Sex in Class Enrollments and Student Ratings of Instructors," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 135-162, January.
    3. Cannon, Edmund & Cipriani, Giam Pietro, 2021. "Gender Differences in Student Evaluations of Teaching: Identification and Consequences," IZA Discussion Papers 14387, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    5. Arora, Puneet & Roy, Moumita, 2025. "Are students really biased against female professors? — Experimental evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Friederike Mengel & Jan Sauermann & Ulf Zölitz, 2019. "Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 535-566.
    7. Angelo Antoci & Irene Brunetti & Pierluigi Sacco & Mauro Sodini, 2021. "Student evaluation of teaching, social influence dynamics, and teachers’ choices: An evolutionary model," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 325-348, January.
    8. Boring, Anne & Philippe, Arnaud, 2021. "Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Paredes, Valentina & Pino, Francisco J. & Díaz, David, 2024. "Does facial structure explain differences in student evaluations of teaching? The role of fWHR as a proxy for perceived dominance," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Sara Ayllón & Lars J. Lefgren & Richard W. Patterson & Olga B. Stoddard & Nicolás Urdaneta Andrade, 2025. "‘Sorting’ Out Gender Discrimination and Disadvantage: Evidence from Student Evaluations of Teaching," NBER Working Papers 33911, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Keng, Shao-Hsun, 2020. "Gender bias and statistical discrimination against female instructors in student evaluations of teaching," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    12. Martin Flegl & Robert Hlavatý, 2022. "Understanding transitions in professors’ evaluation: the application of Markov chain," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 304-323, March.
    13. Buurman, Margaretha & Delfgaauw, Josse & Dur, Robert & Zoutenbier, Robin, 2020. "When do teachers respond to student feedback? Evidence from a field experiment," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Nicol√°s Urdaneta Andrade, 2021. "¬øHombres "cracks" y mujeres "amables"? Sesgos de g√©nero en encuestas de profesores," Documentos CEDE 19557, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    15. Radchenko, Natalia, 2020. "Biases in Student Evaluations of Teaching: An American Case Study," IZA Discussion Papers 13603, IZA Network @ LISER.
    16. Boring, Anne, 2017. "Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 27-41.
    17. Sudhakar Raju, 2025. "Race, gender and beauty in instructional ratings: a quantile regression approach," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 27(1), pages 1-19, April.
    18. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/1seuirq4ak9b9bouu1j29ebui7 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Anne Boring, 2015. "Gender Biases in Student Evaluations of Teachers," Working Papers hal-03470161, HAL.
    20. Coccorese, Paolo & Dell’Anno, Roberto & Restaino, Marialuisa, 2024. "Are outstanding researchers also top teachers? Exploring the link between research quality and teaching quality," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    21. Laura C. Blanco, 2022. "Diferenciales salariales de género y sus determinantes para el personal académico en propiedad en la Universidad de Costa Rica. (Gender wage differentials and its determinants for tenured academics at Universidad de Costa Rica)," Working Papers 202204, Universidad de Costa Rica, revised May 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:2:p:637-661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.