IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v92y2025i2p382-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A rationale for the “meeting competition defense” under primary‐line injury

Author

Listed:
  • Iñaki Aguirre
  • Arda Yenipazarli

Abstract

This paper finds that price discrimination tends to enhance social welfare under oligopoly when the number of firms in the strong market is higher than in the weak market. As a result, we obtain a fundamental justification for the “meeting competition” defense (MCD) under the Robinson‐Patman Act (RPA): In cases of primary‐line injury, when the strong market is more competitive than the weak market, the use of MCD may allow price discrimination to improve social welfare. This outcome holds true regardless of whether price discrimination occurs in the final good market or intermediate good market, and it is robust to the nature of competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Iñaki Aguirre & Arda Yenipazarli, 2025. "A rationale for the “meeting competition defense” under primary‐line injury," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(2), pages 382-402, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:2:p:382-402
    DOI: 10.1002/soej.12756
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12756
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/soej.12756?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:92:y:2025:i:2:p:382-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.