IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v76y2009i2p513-532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Two‐Part Pricing in a Carbon Offset Market: A Comparison of Organizational Types

Author

Listed:
  • Murray Fulton
  • James Vercammen

Abstract

This article examines the optimal two‐part pricing by an intermediary in a carbon offset market. In addition to creating a framework for analyzing carbon offset pricing, this article makes two contributions to the theoretical literature. First, we provide an in‐depth examination of the roles played by the upstream inframarginal supply and participation elasticities and the downstream demand elasticity in determining the optimal two‐part pricing strategy. Second, we compare the pricing decisions of three different organizational types: a for‐profit firm, a public agency, and a producer association. The producer association problem, which has received little attention in the literature, yields counterintuitive results because a producer association must simultaneously reduce output and distribute all profits back to its members.

Suggested Citation

  • Murray Fulton & James Vercammen, 2009. "Optimal Two‐Part Pricing in a Carbon Offset Market: A Comparison of Organizational Types," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 76(2), pages 513-532, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2009:i:2:p:513-532
    DOI: 10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.513
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4284/sej.2009.76.2.513?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2009:i:2:p:513-532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.