IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/soecon/v76y2009i1p183-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Arbitration and Bargaining across the Pacific

Author

Listed:
  • Cary Deck
  • Amy Farmer
  • Dao-Zhi Zeng

Abstract

This paper reports laboratory experiments comparing arbitration behavior between and across two countries with extensive trade relations, the United States and Japan. Besides comparing disputes in both locations, we evaluate disputes between them. While we find nominal differences between the countries, we observe significant changes in both groups' behavior when facing someone from the other country. Specifically, Americans seek larger profits when facing a Japanese counterpart and Japanese subjects settle more frequently with an American counterpart. Our results suggest that the literature on bargaining behavior across cultures paints an incomplete picture of international comparisons by failing to consider bargaining interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Cary Deck & Amy Farmer & Dao-Zhi Zeng, 2009. "Arbitration and Bargaining across the Pacific," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 76(1), pages 183-197, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:183-197
    DOI: 10.4284/sej.2009.76.1.183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2009.76.1.183
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4284/sej.2009.76.1.183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:soecon:v:76:y:2009:i:1:p:183-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2325-8012 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.