IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v5y1985i3p209-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Alternative Safety Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth A. Solomon
  • Pamela F. Nelson
  • James R. Chiesa
  • Katy Wolf

Abstract

Safety criteria for frequency of nuclear‐reactor accidents and for reactor‐induced risk to individuals and to society are evaluated on the basis of their comprehensiveness, clarity, recognition of uncertainty, practicability, defensibility, simplicity, and internal consistency. Many criteria were found to be comprehensive and practicable; few completely satisfied the other evaluation standards. A consensus inferred from the most favorably evaluated criteria would allow between 1.0time10‐4 and 1.0time10‐3 core melts per reactor year, between 1.0time10‐6 and 2.0time10‐5 fatalities per reactor year per individual, and a total exposure in the United States of between 1000 and 10,000 person rems per reactor year. This consensus is consistent with the criteria proposed in NUREG0880.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth A. Solomon & Pamela F. Nelson & James R. Chiesa & Katy Wolf, 1985. "An Evaluation of Alternative Safety Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 209-216, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:5:y:1985:i:3:p:209-216
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00171.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00171.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00171.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:5:y:1985:i:3:p:209-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.