IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v35y2015i6p1154-1166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concordance of Noncarcinogenic Endpoints in Rodent Chemical Bioassays

Author

Listed:
  • Bing Wang
  • George Gray

Abstract

Prediction of noncancer toxicologic outcomes in rodent bioassays of 37 chemicals from the National Toxicology Program was evaluated. Using the nonneoplastic lesions noted by NTP pathologists, we evaluate both agreement in toxic lesions across experiments and the predictive value of the presence (or absence) of a lesion in one group for other groups. We compare lesions between mice and rats, male mice and male rats, and female mice and female rats in both short‐term and long‐term bioassays. We also examine whether lesions found in a specific organ in a short‐term test are also found in the long‐term test of the same chemical. We find agreement (concordance) across species for specific lesions, as evaluated by the Kappa statistic, ranging from 0.58 (for concordance of nasal lesions between female mice and rats in long‐term studies) to −0.14 (lung lesions between mice and rats in long‐term studies). Predictive values are limited by the relatively small numbers of observations of each type of lesion. Positive predictive values range from 100% to 0%. Comparing the lesions found in short‐term tests to those found in long‐term tests resulted in Kappa statistic values from 0.76 (spleen lesions in male rats) to −0.61 (lung lesions in female mice). Positive predictive values of short‐term tests for long‐term tests range from 70% to 0%. Overall, there is considerable uncertainty in predicting the site of toxic lesions in different species exposed to the same chemical and from short‐term to long‐term tests of the same chemical.

Suggested Citation

  • Bing Wang & George Gray, 2015. "Concordance of Noncarcinogenic Endpoints in Rodent Chemical Bioassays," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1154-1166, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:6:p:1154-1166
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jessica Kratchman & Bing Wang & John Fox & George Gray, 2018. "Correlation of Noncancer Benchmark Doses in Short‐ and Long‐Term Rodent Bioassays," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 1052-1069, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:35:y:2015:i:6:p:1154-1166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.