IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v34y2014i2p356-366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of PBPK Models to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment: Case Study on Perchlorate and Radioiodide Human Lifestage Models

Author

Listed:
  • Eva D. McLanahan
  • Paul White
  • Lynn Flowers
  • Paul M. Schlosser

Abstract

Physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are often submitted to or selected by agencies, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, for consideration for application in human health risk assessment (HHRA). Recently, U.S. EPA evaluated the human PBPK models for perchlorate and radioiodide for their ability to estimate the relative sensitivity of perchlorate inhibition on thyroidal radioiodide uptake for various population groups and lifestages. The most well‐defined mode of action of the environmental contaminant, perchlorate, is competitive inhibition of thyroidal iodide uptake by the sodium‐iodide symporter (NIS). In this analysis, a six‐step framework for PBPK model evaluation was followed, and with a few modifications, the models were determined to be suitable for use in HHRA to evaluate relative sensitivity among human lifestages. Relative sensitivity to perchlorate was determined by comparing the PBPK model predicted percent inhibition of thyroidal radioactive iodide uptake (RAIU) by perchlorate for different lifestages. A limited sensitivity analysis indicated that model parameters describing urinary excretion of perchlorate and iodide were particularly important in prediction of RAIU inhibition; therefore, a range of biologically plausible values available in the peer‐reviewed literature was evaluated. Using the updated PBPK models, the greatest sensitivity to RAIU inhibition was predicted to be the near‐term fetus (gestation week 40) compared to the average adult and other lifestages; however, when exposure factors were taken into account, newborns were found to be populations that need further evaluation and consideration in a risk assessment for perchlorate.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva D. McLanahan & Paul White & Lynn Flowers & Paul M. Schlosser, 2014. "The Use of PBPK Models to Inform Human Health Risk Assessment: Case Study on Perchlorate and Radioiodide Human Lifestage Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 356-366, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:2:p:356-366
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12101
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12101
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12101?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leona H. Clark & R. Woodrow Setzer & Hugh A. Barton, 2004. "Framework for Evaluation of Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Use in Safety or Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1697-1717, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Wambaugh & Imran Shah, 2010. "Simulating Microdosimetry in a Virtual Hepatic Lobule," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Deepika Deepika & Vikas Kumar, 2023. "The Role of “Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model (PBPK)” New Approach Methodology (NAM) in Pharmaceuticals and Environmental Chemical Risk Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Dustin F Kapraun & John F Wambaugh & R Woodrow Setzer & Richard S Judson, 2019. "Empirical models for anatomical and physiological changes in a human mother and fetus during pregnancy and gestation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-56, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:34:y:2014:i:2:p:356-366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.