IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v29y2009i11p1495-1505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk of Fetal Mortality After Exposure to Listeria monocytogenes Based on Dose‐Response Data from Pregnant Guinea Pigs and Primates

Author

Listed:
  • Denita Williams
  • Jennifer Castleman
  • Chi‐Ching Lee
  • Beth Mote
  • Mary Alice Smith

Abstract

One‐third of the annual cases of listeriosis in the United States occur during pregnancy and can lead to miscarriage or stillbirth, premature delivery, or infection of the newborn. Previous risk assessments completed by the Food and Drug Administration/the Food Safety Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture/the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (FDA/USDA/CDC)(1) and Food and Agricultural Organization/the World Health Organization (FAO/WHO)(2) were based on dose‐response data from mice. Recent animal studies using nonhuman primates(3,4) and guinea pigs(5) have both estimated LD50s of approximately 107 Listeria monocytogenes colony forming units (cfu). The FAO/WHO(2) estimated a human LD50 of 1.9 × 106 cfu based on data from a pregnant woman consuming contaminated soft cheese. We reevaluated risk based on dose‐response curves from pregnant rhesus monkeys and guinea pigs. Using standard risk assessment methodology including hazard identification, exposure assessment, hazard characterization, and risk characterization, risk was calculated based on the new dose‐response information. To compare models, we looked at mortality rate per serving at predicted doses ranging from 10−4 to 1012 L. monocytogenes cfu. Based on a serving of 106 L. monocytogenes cfu, the primate model predicts a death rate of 5.9 × 10−1 compared to the FDA/USDA/CDC (fig. IV‐12)(1) predicted rate of 1.3 × 10−7. Based on the guinea pig and primate models, the mortality rate calculated by the FDA/USDA/CDC(1) is underestimated for this susceptible population.

Suggested Citation

  • Denita Williams & Jennifer Castleman & Chi‐Ching Lee & Beth Mote & Mary Alice Smith, 2009. "Risk of Fetal Mortality After Exposure to Listeria monocytogenes Based on Dose‐Response Data from Pregnant Guinea Pigs and Primates," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11), pages 1495-1505, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:11:p:1495-1505
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01308.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01308.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01308.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:29:y:2009:i:11:p:1495-1505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.