IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v24y2004i3p751-770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computational Modeling of Serum‐Binding Proteins and Clearance in Extrapolations Across Life Stages and Species for Endocrine Active Compounds

Author

Listed:
  • Justin G. Teeguarden
  • Hugh A. Barton

Abstract

One measure of the potency of compounds that lead to the effects through ligand‐dependent gene transcription is the relative affinity for the critical receptor. Endocrine active compounds that are presumed to act principally through binding to the estrogen receptor (e.g., estradiol, genistein, bisphenol A, and octylphenol) comprise one class of such compounds. For making simple comparisons, receptor‐binding affinity has been equated to in vivo potency, which consequently defines the dose‐response characteristics for the compound. Direct extrapolation of in vitro estimated affinities to the corresponding in vivo system and to specific species or life stages (e.g., neonatal, pregnancy) can be misleading. Accurate comparison of the potency of endocrine active compounds requires characterization of biochemical and pharmacokinetic factors that affect their free concentration. Quantitative in vitro and in vivo models were developed for integrating pharmacokinetics factors (e.g., serum protein and receptor‐binding affinities, clearance) that affect potency. Data for parameterizing these models for several estrogenic compounds were evaluated and the models exercised. While simulations of adult human or rat sera were generally successful, difficulties in describing early life stages were identified. Exogenous compounds were predicted to be largely ineffective at competing estradiol off serum‐binding proteins, suggesting this was unlikely to be physiologically significant. Discrepancies were identified between relative potencies based upon modeling in vitro receptor‐binding activity versus in vivo activity in the presence of clearance and serum‐binding proteins. The examples illustrate the utility of this approach for integrating available experimental data from in vitro and in vivo studies to estimate the relative potency of these compounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin G. Teeguarden & Hugh A. Barton, 2004. "Computational Modeling of Serum‐Binding Proteins and Clearance in Extrapolations Across Life Stages and Species for Endocrine Active Compounds," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(3), pages 751-770, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:3:p:751-770
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00473.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00473.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00473.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leona H. Clark & R. Woodrow Setzer & Hugh A. Barton, 2004. "Framework for Evaluation of Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Use in Safety or Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(6), pages 1697-1717, December.
    2. Paul M. Schlosser & Susan J. Borghoff & Nicholas G. Coldham & John A. David & Sujit K. Ghosh, 2006. "Physiologically‐Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Genistein in Rats, Part I: Model Development," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 483-500, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:3:p:751-770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.