IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v24y2004i1p197-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defining Susceptibility for Microbial Risk Assessment: Results of a Workshop

Author

Listed:
  • John Balbus
  • Rebecca Parkin
  • Anna Makri
  • Lisa Ragain
  • Martha Embrey
  • Fred Hauchman

Abstract

An interdisciplinary workshop was convened by the George Washington University in June 2001 to discuss how to incorporate new knowledge about susceptibility to microbial pathogens into risk assessment and management strategies. Experts from government, academic, and private sector organizations discussed definitions, methods, data needs, and issues related to susceptibility in microbial risk assessment. The participants agreed that modeling approaches need to account for the highly specific nature of host‐pathogen relationships, and the wide variability of infectivity, immunity, disease transmission, and outcome rates within microbial species and strains. Concerns were raised about distinguishing between exposure and dose more clearly, interpreting experimental and outbreak data correctly, and using thresholds and possibly linearity at low doses. Recommendations were made to advance microbial risk assessment by defining specific terms and concepts more precisely, designing explicit conceptual frameworks to guide development of more complex models and data collection, addressing susceptibility in all steps of the model, measuring components of immunity to characterize susceptibility, reexamining underlying assumptions, applying default methods appropriately, obtaining more mechanistic data to improve default methods, and developing more biologically relevant and continuous risk estimators. The interrelated impacts of selecting specific subpopulations and health outcomes, and of increasing model complexity and data demands, were considered in the contexts of public policy goals and resources required. The participants stated that zero risk is unattainable, so targeted and effective risk reduction and communication strategies are essential not only to raise pubic awareness about water quality but also to protect the most susceptible members of the population.

Suggested Citation

  • John Balbus & Rebecca Parkin & Anna Makri & Lisa Ragain & Martha Embrey & Fred Hauchman, 2004. "Defining Susceptibility for Microbial Risk Assessment: Results of a Workshop," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 197-208, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:1:p:197-208
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00423.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00423.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00423.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rebecca T. Parkin & John M. Balbus, 2000. "Variations in Concepts of “Susceptibility” in Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5), pages 603-612, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Makri & Reza Modarres & Rebecca Parkin, 2004. "Cryptosporidiosis Susceptibility and Risk: A Case Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(1), pages 209-220, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:24:y:2004:i:1:p:197-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.