IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v23y2003i6p1199-1208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health Risk Assessment After Decontamination of the Beaches Polluted by the Wrecked ERIKA Tanker

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Dor
  • Roseline Bonnard
  • Claire Gourier‐Fréry
  • André Cicolella
  • Roland Dujardin
  • Denis Zmirou

Abstract

Following the wreck of the oil tanker ERIKA off the north‐west coast of France in December 1999, cleaning up of the beaches involved considerable work, which in any case could not be perfect. This raised the question of the short‐ and long‐term health risks for the future bathers related to the toxicity of the remaining oil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). This risk assessment study was conducted to help health authorities plan risk management policies and inform the public. Thirty‐six beaches were selected, representing a sample of the most frequently encountered topographic and beach usage situations; seven “control” beaches, unspoiled by ERIKA, were also investigated. Samples of water and sand were taken from each site, as well as from the surface of rocks. The 16 PAHs selected by the U.S. EPA were quantified in each environment. Several scenarios of exposure were contemplated: (1) a child between 2 and 4 years accidentally ingesting a small ball of fuel, (2) a child daily exposed throughout his holiday‐time stay, (3) an adult (including a pregnant woman) spending his/her holidays on the coast, (4) an adult working on the beach, (5) and an adult practicing water sports. Among the available and significant toxicological values, the most conservative ones were selected for computing risks. The sand and water, after decontamination, were slightly polluted (respectively, 7.8 μg/kg and 23.3 ng/l of total 16 PAHs), with values similar to those found in the control beaches. By contrast, the rocky areas in some places were still highly polluted (up to 23 mg/kg on the surface layer). No lethal risk was found for a young child who had accidentally ingested a small ball of fuel. The life‐long excess risks for skin cancer and for all other cancers were about 10−5 in scenarios including contact with the polluted rocks. In all other cases, excess risks were considerably lower. The hazard quotient for teratogenic effects was very small, except in scenarios where pregnant women would walk among rocks containing high pollution levels. In conclusion, exposure was mainly associated with polluted water among children, and with spoiled rocks for adults. Despite uncertainties, mainly dealing with the prediction of long‐term risks following a short‐term exposure, this study showed that beaches where pollution was no longer visible after decontamination did not entail any significant health risks and could be opened to the public.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Dor & Roseline Bonnard & Claire Gourier‐Fréry & André Cicolella & Roland Dujardin & Denis Zmirou, 2003. "Health Risk Assessment After Decontamination of the Beaches Polluted by the Wrecked ERIKA Tanker," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1199-1208, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:1199-1208
    DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00394.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00394.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00394.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duncan J. Murdoch & Daniel Krewski, 1988. "Carcinogenic Risk Assessment with Time‐Dependent Exposure Patterns," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(4), pages 521-530, December.
    2. D. W. Gaylor & S. J. Culp & L. S. Goldstein & F. A. Beland, 2000. "Cancer Risk Estimation for Mixtures of Coal Tars and Benzo(a)pyrene," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 81-86, February.
    3. Ralph L. Kodell & David W. Gaylor & James J. Chen, 1987. "Using Average Lifetime Dose Rate for Intermittent Exposures to Carcinogens," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 339-345, September.
    4. James J. Chen & Ralph L. Kodell & David W. Gaylor, 1988. "Using the Biological Two‐Stage Model to Assess Risk from Short‐Term Exposures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 8(2), pages 223-230, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Krewski & D .W. Gaylor & A. P. Soms & M. Szyszkowicz, 1993. "An Overview of the Report: Correlation Between Carcinogenic Potency and the Maximum Tolerated Dose: Implications for Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 383-398, August.
    2. Duncan J. Murdoch & Daniel Krewski & John Wargo, 1992. "Cancer Risk Assessment with Intermittent Exposure," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 569-577, December.
    3. Lynne T. Haber & Alison M. Pecquet & Melissa J. Vincent & Louise M. White, 2022. "The Long Goodbye: Finally Moving on from the Relative Potency Approach to a Mixtures Approach for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:6:p:1199-1208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.