IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v23y2003i1p107-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods and Rationale for Derivation of a Reference Dose for Methylmercury by the U.S. EPA

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah C. Rice
  • Rita Schoeny
  • Kate Mahaffey

Abstract

In 2001, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency derived a reference dose (RfD) for methylmercury, which is a daily intake that is likely to be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. This derivation used a series of benchmark dose (BMD) analyses provided by a National Research Council (NRC) panel convened to assess the health effects of methylmercury. Analyses were performed for a number of endpoints from three large longitudinal cohort studies of the neuropsychological consequences of in utero exposure to methylmercury: the Faroe Islands, Seychelles Islands, and New Zealand studies. Adverse effects were identified in the Faroe Islands and New Zealand studies, but not in the Seychelles Islands. The NRC also performed an integrative analysis of all three studies. The EPA applied a total uncertainty factor (UF) of 10 for intrahuman toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic variability and uncertainty. Dose conversion from cord blood mercury concentrations to maternal methylmercury intake was performed using a one‐compartment model. Derivation of potential RfDs from a number of endpoints from the Faroe Islands study converged on 0.1 μg/kg/day, as did the integrative analysis of all three studies. EPA identified several areas for which further information or analyses is needed. Perhaps the most immediately relevant is the ratio of cord:maternal blood mercury concentration, as well as the variability around this ratio. EPA assumed in its dose conversion that the ratio was 1.0; however, available data suggest it is perhaps 1.5–2.0. Verification of a deviation from unity presumably would be translated directly into comparable reduction in the RfD. Other areas that EPA identified as significant areas requiring further attention are cardiovascular consequences of methylmercury exposure and delayed neurotoxicity during aging as a result of previous developmental or adult exposure.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah C. Rice & Rita Schoeny & Kate Mahaffey, 2003. "Methods and Rationale for Derivation of a Reference Dose for Methylmercury by the U.S. EPA," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(1), pages 107-115, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:107-115
    DOI: 10.1111/1539-6924.00294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1539-6924.00294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary L. Ginsberg & Brian F. Toal, 2000. "Development of a Single‐Meal Fish Consumption Advisory for Methyl Mercury," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 41-48, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Dack & Matthew Fell & Caroline M. Taylor & Alexandra Havdahl & Sarah J. Lewis, 2022. "Prenatal Mercury Exposure and Neurodevelopment up to the Age of 5 Years: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Adam M. Schaefer & Emily L. Jensen & Gregory D. Bossart & John S. Reif, 2014. "Hair Mercury Concentrations and Fish Consumption Patterns in Florida Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Adam M. Schaefer & Matthew Zoffer & Luke Yrastorza & Daniel M. Pearlman & Gregory D. Bossart & Ruel Stoessel & John S. Reif, 2019. "Mercury Exposure, Fish Consumption, and Perceived Risk among Pregnant Women in Coastal Florida," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Dariush Mozaffarian, 2009. "Fish, Mercury, Selenium and Cardiovascular Risk: Current Evidence and Unanswered Questions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-23, June.
    5. Zhao Dong & Michael S. Bank & John D. Spengler, 2015. "Assessing Metal Exposures in a Community near a Cement Plant in the Northeast U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrycja L. Gradowska & Roger M. Cooke, 2014. "Estimating expected value of information using Bayesian belief networks: a case study in fish consumption advisory," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 88-97, March.
    2. E. Srebocan & J. Pompe-Gotal & A. Prevendar-Crnic & E. Ofner, 2007. "Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) farmed in the Adriatic Sea," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 175-177.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:107-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.