IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v18y1998i6p741-753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Scaling of Single Oral Lethal Doses Across Mammalian Species Based on a Large Database

Author

Listed:
  • Lorenz R. Rhomberg
  • Scott K. Wolff

Abstract

The scaling of administered doses to achieve equal degrees of toxic effect in different species has been relatively poorly examined for noncancer toxicity, either empirically or theoretically. We investigate empirical patterns in the correspondence of single oral dose LD, values across several mammalian species for a large number of chemicals based on data reported in the RTECSQ database maintained by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. We find a good correspondence of LD, values across species when the dose levels are expressed in terms of mgadministered per kg of body mass. Our findings contrast with earlier analyses that support scaling doses by the 3/4‐power of body mass to achieve equal subacute toxicity of antineoplastic agents. We suggest that, especially for severe toxicity, single‐ and repeated‐dosing regimes may have different cross‐species scaling properties, as they may depend on standing levels of defenses and rate of regeneration of defenses, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorenz R. Rhomberg & Scott K. Wolff, 1998. "Empirical Scaling of Single Oral Lethal Doses Across Mammalian Species Based on a Large Database," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 741-753, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:18:y:1998:i:6:p:741-753
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01117.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01117.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01117.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kevin P. Brand & J Lorenz Rhomberg & John S. Evans, 1999. "Estimating Noncancer Uncertainty Factors: Are Ratios NOAELs Informative?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 295-308, April.
    2. Richard Wilson, 2012. "The Development of Risk Analysis: A Personal Perspective," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(12), pages 2010-2019, December.
    3. Paul S. Price & Heli M. Hollnagel & Jack M. Zabik, 2009. "Characterizing the Noncancer Toxicity of Mixtures Using Concepts from the TTC and Quantitative Models of Uncertainty in Mixture Toxicity," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11), pages 1534-1548, November.
    4. Roger Cooke, 2010. "Conundrums with Uncertainty Factors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 330-339, March.
    5. Lidia Burzala‐Kowalczyk & Geurt Jongbloed, 2011. "Allometric Scaling: Analysis of LD50 Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 523-532, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:18:y:1998:i:6:p:741-753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.