IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v17y1997i6p705-715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causality Assessment of the Acute Health Complaints Reported in Association with Oxygenated Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Nancy J. Balter

Abstract

In some areas where oxygenated fuel programs have been implemented, there have been widespread complaints of non‐specific health effects attributed to the gasoline. There are a number of hypotheses that can account for this apparent association. This paper examines the hypothesis that the use of oxy‐fuel (either oxygenated gasoline or reformulated gasoline) results in exposure of the general population to one or more chemicals at concentrations that cause toxicologic injury. Although several oxygenates can be used in oxy‐fuels, this analysis focuses on MTBE because it is the most widely used oxygenate and because the database of relevant toxicologic data is greatest for this oxygenate. The causal assessment is based on an evaluation of the qualitative and quantitative plausibility that oxygenated fuel‐related exposures have toxicological effects, and the epidemiologic studies that directly test the hypothesis that the use of oxygenated fuels causes adverse health effects. The plausibility that chemical exposures related to oxy‐fuel use cause toxicological effects is very low. This determination is based on consideration of the exposure‐response and time‐action profiles for relevant toxicological effects of MTBE in animals, experimental MTBE exposure studies in humans, and the possibility that the addition of MTBE to gasoline results in toxicologically significant qualitative and/or quantitative changes in gasoline‐related exposures. Similarly, the epidemiologic studies of oxy‐fuel exposed cohorts do not support a causal relationship between oxy‐fuel use and adverse health effects. Although the data are insufficient to rule the possibility of unique sensitivity in a small segment of the population, the strength of the evidence and the availability of other more plausible explanations for the health complaints reported in association with oxy‐fuels support a high degree of confidence in the conclusion that MTBE‐containing oxygenated fuels are not the cause of acute toxicity in the general population.

Suggested Citation

  • Nancy J. Balter, 1997. "Causality Assessment of the Acute Health Complaints Reported in Association with Oxygenated Fuels," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 705-715, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:6:p:705-715
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01277.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01277.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb01277.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pamela R. D. Williams & Colleen A. Cushing & Patrick J. Sheehan, 2003. "Data Available for Evaluating the Risks and Benefits of MTBE and Ethanol as Alternative Fuel Oxygenates," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5), pages 1085-1115, October.
    2. Bonnie R. Stern & Robert G. Tardiff, 1997. "Risk Characterization of Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) in Tap Water," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(6), pages 727-743, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:6:p:705-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.