IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v17y1997i2p203-214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview of a Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard F. Laniak
  • James G. Droppo
  • Ernest R. Faillace
  • Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam
  • William B. Mills
  • Dennis L. Strenge
  • Gene Whelan
  • Charley Yu

Abstract

Multimedia modelers from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the United States Department of Energy (DOE) collaborated to conduct a detailed and quantitative benchmarking analysis of three multimedia models. The three models—RESRAD (DOE), MMSOILS (EPA), and MEPAS (DOE)—represent analytically‐based tools that are used by the respective agencies for performing human exposure and health risk assessments. The study is performed by individuals who participate directly in the ongoing design, development, and application of the models. Model form and function are compared by applying the models to a series of hypothetical problems, first isolating individual modules (e.g., atmospheric, surface water, groundwater) and then simulating multimedia‐based risk resulting from contaminant release from a single source to multiple environmental media. Study results show that the models differ with respect to environmental processes included (i.e., model features) and the mathematical formulation and assumptions related to the implementation of solutions. Depending on the application, numerical estimates resulting from the models may vary over several orders‐of‐magnitude. On the other hand, two or more differences may offset each other such that model predictions are virtually equal. The conclusion from these results is that multimedia models are complex due to the integration of the many components of a risk assessment and this complexity must be fully appreciated during each step of the modeling process (i.e., model selection, problem conceptualization, model application, and interpretation of results).

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard F. Laniak & James G. Droppo & Ernest R. Faillace & Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam & William B. Mills & Dennis L. Strenge & Gene Whelan & Charley Yu, 1997. "An Overview of a Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 203-214, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:2:p:203-214
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00859.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00859.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00859.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William B. Mills & Christine S. Lew & Cheng Y. Hung, 1999. "Sensitivity of Concentration and Risk Predictions in the PRESTO and MMSOILS Multimedia Models: Regression Technique Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 511-525, June.
    2. William B. Mills & J. J. Cheng & James G. Droppo & Ernest R. Faillace & Emmanuel K. Gnanapragasam & Robert A. Johns & Gerard F. Laniak & Christine S. Lew & Dennis L. Strenge & Jonna F. Sutherland & Ge, 1997. "Multimedia Benchmarking Analysis for Three Risk Assessment Models: RESRAD, MMSOILS, and MEPAS," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 187-201, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:17:y:1997:i:2:p:203-214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.