IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v14y1994i6p993-1000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Biological Realism in Dioxin Risk Assessment Models Michael

Author

Listed:
  • C. Kohn
  • George W. Lucier
  • Christopher J. Portier

Abstract

Mechanistic mathematical models of hepatocarcinogenesis in the female rat were constructed to investigate possible relationships among the Ah, estrogen, and EGF receptors in TCDD hepato‐carcinogenicity. Each model generates dose‐response curves for the expression of biomarker liver proteins CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and residual plasma membrane EGF receptor consequent to exposure to TCDD. The shapes of the response curves were strongly dependent on the assumed mechanisms of constitutive expression of these proteins. Assuming a constant level of the hepatic Ah receptor, a sigmoidal dose‐response of hepatic CYP1A1 to total liver TCDD was computed. However, inclusion of induction of the Ah receptor by TCDD in a physiologically realistic dosimetric model produced a linear low‐dose response of CYP1A1. This behavior was computed to arise from the net effect of sublinear response of CYP1A1 mRNA to the concentration of the Ah‐TCDD complex and supralinear response of the protein concentration to the mRNA level, illustrating the importance of biological realism in dose‐response modeling. The dosimetric model also computed effects of TCDD on the hepatic estradiol concentration and consequent effects on the binding capacity of the EGF receptor and suggests plausible mechanisms for tumor promotion by TCDD. Setting circulating estradiol levels in the model to values typical of the male rat indicated possible sources of the differences in the responses of the EGF receptor and in development of tumors in the two sexes.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Kohn & George W. Lucier & Christopher J. Portier, 1994. "The Importance of Biological Realism in Dioxin Risk Assessment Models Michael," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(6), pages 993-1000, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:14:y:1994:i:6:p:993-1000
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00068.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00068.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00068.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael C. Kohn, 2002. "Use of Sensitivity Analysis to Assess Reliability of Metabolic and Physiological Models," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 623-631, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:14:y:1994:i:6:p:993-1000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.