IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v44y2026i2ne70043.html

The distributional impacts of earmarked taxes and co‐payments in healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Manjeet Kaur Harnek Singh
  • Noorasiah Sulaiman
  • Arief Anshory Yusuf

Abstract

This study analyses the distributional impact of healthcare reform policies using a computable general equilibrium model with disaggregated household groups. Two simulations are conducted using a static computable general equilibrium model for Malaysia based on a health‐focused Social Accounting Matrix to align with the government's aims in the Health White Paper: implementing an earmarked tax and a co‐payment system. The findings suggest that the earmarked tax scenario significantly benefits low‐income people if public health subsidies are expanded under the revenue neutrality policy. The welfare effect becomes more pronounced when the simultaneous health effect is present. Regarding expenditure, the household‐specific consumer price index demonstrates notable progressivity among urban households in the co‐payment simulation but not in the earmarked tax simulations. It is plausible to claim that raising the healthcare fund would boost welfare only if taxpayers received more benefits, as in the earmarked tax scenario. The findings provide insights for designing equitable and fiscally sustainable healthcare financing reforms in Malaysia, particularly in balancing revenue generation with distributional equity across income groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Manjeet Kaur Harnek Singh & Noorasiah Sulaiman & Arief Anshory Yusuf, 2026. "The distributional impacts of earmarked taxes and co‐payments in healthcare," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70043
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.