IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v44y2026i2ne70039.html

The origins of ESG demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings

Author

Listed:
  • Leyuan You
  • Janet Payne

Abstract

This paper examines the origin of the demand for corporate environmental responsibility in capital markets by comparing the responses of retail and institutional investors to environmental information releases. Employing public green rankings for S&P 500 firms, we show that retail investors respond positively to increases in public rankings by paying a green premium and increasing their holdings during the period when environmental, social and governance (ESG) investment was becoming increasingly popular. Conversely, increases in private green scores do not result in significant market reactions, indicating that institutional investors did not emphasize environmental protection in their investment decisions. A quasi‐natural experiment and robustness tests with institutional holdings provide additional support for this finding. This effect has disappeared in recent years, as demand from retail investors has been met by institutional options. Overall, this study provides evidence that retail investors are the primary drivers of early demand for environmental responsibility, providing important policy implications to incentivize institutional investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Leyuan You & Janet Payne, 2026. "The origins of ESG demand: Evidence from retail and institutional investor responses to environmental rankings," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70039
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.70039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.70039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.