IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v44y2026i2ne70035.html

Preference reversal and quantitative easing

Author

Listed:
  • Apostolos Xanthopoulos
  • Oguzhan Batmaz

Abstract

This study examines how U.S. quantitative easing (QE) has influenced risk‐taking in foreign exchange markets, focusing on the unintended spillover effects of the U.S. central bank's efforts to prop up market risk‐taking in major and emerging market currencies outside the U.S. economy. Using a polynomial utility framework, we demonstrate that QE has enticed asymmetric, tail‐risk‐seeking behaviors, especially in currencies without direct central bank intervention, such as the Mexican Peso. While inflation would typically discourage foreign speculation under purchasing power parity (PPP), QE's indirect effects on these non‐QE currencies amplify speculative interest. This preference reversal is most pronounced in the Americas (the Canadian Dollar and the Mexican Peso) and select European currencies (the Norwegian Krone), contrasting with more subdued effects in mainland European markets. Our findings reveal that inflation in Mexico, absent domestic intervention, has fueled a type of risk‐seeking behavior whose bond market‐propping effects the U.S. policy‐makers likely intended to contain domestically. This study addresses the “leakage” of QE benefits and risks across borders, providing evidence that QE has led to credit expansion and heightened tail‐risk‐taking in non‐QE economies. The study also examines a global equilibrium framework to assess how QE impacts cross‐currency financial variables, highlighting disparities in iso‐risk adjustments. This research highlights the global impact of unconventional monetary policy, suggesting that U.S. QE inadvertently promotes speculative activity and reshapes risk preferences in economies beyond its target domicile, challenging traditional efficiency assumptions in international markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Apostolos Xanthopoulos & Oguzhan Batmaz, 2026. "Preference reversal and quantitative easing," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70035
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.70035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.70035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.70035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.