IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v40y2022i2p150-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Case study of event risk management with options strangles and straddles

Author

Listed:
  • Clemens Kownatzki
  • Bluford Putnam
  • Arthur Yu

Abstract

Event risk environments may involve an elevated probability of both volatility regime shifts and sharp, abrupt price changes, either up or down. Purely direction‐oriented risk management approaches are not necessarily well‐suited for these market conditions. In this exploratory case study, we look at the possibility that non‐directional options strategies, such as straddles and strangles, may offer interesting benefits in the management of potential event risk environments. Our research involves only the case of the S&P500® Index from 2018 through 2020. We utilize the Market Sentiment Meter from CME Group to identify periods in which event risk may be present and particularly when the probability of sharp, abrupt price changes may be elevated. Our findings in this specific case suggest that selling option straddles and strangles during typical market conditions and then buying option straddles and strangles when the market sentiment switches to a more extreme state offers potential as an effective risk management approach for event risk. More research is needed over longer periods and for different securities, including international equity indices, to explore the usefulness of options strategies for event risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Clemens Kownatzki & Bluford Putnam & Arthur Yu, 2022. "Case study of event risk management with options strangles and straddles," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 150-167, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:150-167
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1143
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.1143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:40:y:2022:i:2:p:150-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.