IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/revfec/v39y2021i3p232-253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor unemployment insurance and accounting conservatism

Author

Listed:
  • Yixin Liu
  • Huishan Wan
  • Yilei Zhang

Abstract

We use state‐level increases in unemployment insurance (UI) benefits as exogenous shocks to unemployment risk to examine its effect on accounting conservatism. Employing difference‐in‐differences analyses, we find an increase in accounting conservatism after UI benefit increases. Our findings support the employee perception management hypothesis, which argues that in order to mitigate labor costs associated with worker turnover, firms have incentives to manage employees’ perceived job security through less conservative accounting. When UI laws reduce workers’ separation costs, employer firms have less incentives to manage employees’ perception, attributing to the positive relation between UI benefits and accounting conservatism. Subsample tests show that this effect is driven by labor‐intensive firms as well as firms with higher risk. Overall, our paper suggests that labor market frictions have a significant impact on firm's accounting reporting policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yixin Liu & Huishan Wan & Yilei Zhang, 2021. "Labor unemployment insurance and accounting conservatism," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 232-253, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:39:y:2021:i:3:p:232-253
    DOI: 10.1002/rfe.1114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/rfe.1114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:revfec:v:39:y:2021:i:3:p:232-253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1873-5924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.