IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v19y2025i3p637-655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Dionys Zink
  • Christoph Knill
  • Yves Steinebach

Abstract

Research on policy implementation traditionally has focused on understanding the success or failure of individual policies within specific contexts. Little attention has been given to the challenges that emerge from the cumulative growth of policy portfolios over time. This paper is addressing this research gap by examining the phenomenon of organizational policy triage, which occurs when implementation organizations face overload and are forced to make trade‐off decisions between the implementation of the different policies in their portfolios. We investigate empirical patterns of policy triage across 16 social and environmental implementation agencies in five European countries (Denmark, Germany, Ireland, Italy, and UK). We show that variation in policy triage can be explained by the combination of three central factors: blame‐shifting opportunities, the mobilization of external resources, and the commitment to compensate for overload by implementation authorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Dionys Zink & Christoph Knill & Yves Steinebach, 2025. "Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 637-655, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:3:p:637-655
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12581
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:3:p:637-655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.