IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v19y2025i2p482-495.html

The Development of Carbon Markets in Upper‐Middle‐Income Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Pieter E. Stek
  • Renato Lima‐de‐Oliveira
  • Thessa Vasudhevan

Abstract

Upper‐middle‐income economies face a specific set of trade‐offs when reducing carbon emissions, which differ from the trade‐offs faced in low‐ and high‐income economies. To mobilize domestic funds, middle‐income countries are developing carbon markets to attract private sector investment. This study advances a theoretical framework for carbon market development and explores the process in Brazil, Indonesia, and Malaysia. The case of Malaysia is examined in depth due to the slow development of its carbon market compared to its peers. Analysis reveals that Malaysia faces a carbon market dilemma due to high domestic emissions and internal challenges related to energy market regulation and land ownership, which have hindered the emergence of a pro‐carbon market coalition. In contrast, Brazil and Indonesia have been more active in the international voluntary carbon market and have implemented key regulations with domestic political support. This study provides insights into the challenges and opportunities of carbon market development in middle‐income economies, highlighting the importance of resource endowments and an enabling coalition for successful implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Pieter E. Stek & Renato Lima‐de‐Oliveira & Thessa Vasudhevan, 2025. "The Development of Carbon Markets in Upper‐Middle‐Income Countries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(2), pages 482-495, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:2:p:482-495
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anita Engels, 2018. "Understanding how China is championing climate change mitigation," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Pierre Guigon, 2010. "Voluntary Carbon Markets: How can they Serve Climate Policies?," OECD Environment Working Papers 19, OECD Publishing.
    3. Nicolas Kreibich & Lukas Hermwille, 2021. "Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(7), pages 939-957, August.
    4. Rogowski, Ronald, 1987. "Political Cleavages and Changing Exposure to Trade," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 81(4), pages 1121-1137, December.
    5. Lian Pin Koh & Yiwen Zeng & Tasya Vadya Sarira & Kelly Siman, 2021. "Carbon prospecting in tropical forests for climate change mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Jerome Maucourant & Sebastien Plociniczak, 2013. "The Institution, the Economy and the Market: Karl Polanyi's Institutional Thought for Economists," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 512-531, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Suk Park & Eunju Hwang, 2023. "Sectoral FTA gains, conflicts, and the role of interindustry factor mobility: Evidence from Korea's free trade agreement," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 97-123, February.
    2. F Ollier D Andrianambinina & Derek Schuurman & Mamy A Rakotoarijaona & Chantal N Razanajovy & Honorath M Ramparany & Serge C Rafanoharana & H Andry Rasamuel & Kevin D Faragher & Patrick O Waeber & Luc, 2023. "Boost the resilience of protected areas to shocks by reducing their dependency on tourism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Eid M. Alotaibi & Abdulaziz M. Alwathnani, 2025. "AI-Enabled ESG Compliance Audit for Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-19, October.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:buvzy_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Christian Dippel & Robert Gold & Stephan Heblich & Rodrigo Pinto, 2017. "Instrumental Variables and Causal Mechanisms: Unpacking the Effect of Trade on Workers and Voters," CESifo Working Paper Series 6816, CESifo.
    6. Bayne, Karen M. & Grant, Andrea, 2024. "Who cares what happens with planted forests? A public typology to assist community engagement and communication," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    7. Yiwen Zeng & Rebecca K. Runting & James E. M. Watson & Luis Roman Carrasco, 2022. "Telecoupled environmental impacts are an obstacle to meeting the sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 76-82, February.
    8. Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto & Maria Petrova & Ruben Enikolopov, 2008. "The Dracula effect: voter information and trade policy," Economics Working Papers 1296, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2020.
    9. Ilan Vertinsky & Yingqiu Kuang & Dongsheng Zhou & Victor Cui, 2023. "The political economy and dynamics of bifurcated world governance and the decoupling of value chains: An alternative perspective," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(7), pages 1351-1377, September.
    10. Lei, Heng & Xue, Minggao & Ye, Jing, 2024. "The nexus between ReFi, carbon, fossil energy, and clean energy assets: Quantile time–frequency connectedness and portfolio implications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Stephen, Matthew D., 2014. "Rising powers, global capitalism and liberal global governance: A historical materialist account of the BRICs challenge," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 912-938.
    12. Hongli Liu & Xiaoyu Yan & Jinhua Cheng & Jun Zhang & Yan Bu, 2021. "Driving Factors for the Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity in Technical Efficiency of China’s New Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Günther, Philipp & Garske, Beatrice & Heyl, Katharine & Ekardt, Felix, 2024. "Carbon farming, overestimated negative emissions and the limits to emissions trading in land-use governance: the EU carbon removal certification proposal," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36, pages 1-24.
    14. Ivano Cardinale & Michael Landesmann, 2016. "Exploring Sectoral Conflicts of Interest in the Eurozone: A Structural Political Economy Approach," wiiw Essays and Occasional Papers 3, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    15. J. Bradford Jensen & Dennis P. Quinn & Stephen Weymouth, 2014. "The Influences Of Foreign Direct Investments, Intrafirm Trading, And Currency Undervaluation On U.S. Firm Trade Disputes," Working Papers 14-04, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    16. repec:bge:wpaper:514 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Cardinale, Ivano & Landesmann, Michael, 2022. "Generalising the political economy of structural change: A Structural Political Economy approach," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 546-558.
    18. Mayda, Anna Maria & Rodrik, Dani, 2005. "Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1393-1430, August.
    19. Fiegenbaum, Hanna, 2024. "Complementing Carbon Credits from Forest-Related Activities with Biodiversity Insurance and Resilience Value," OSF Preprints buvzy, Center for Open Science.
    20. Jean-Michel Servet & Bruno Tinel, 2020. "The behavioral and neoliberal foundations of randomizations," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-02562758, HAL.
    21. Dolan, Lindsay & Kubinec, Robert & Nielson, Daniel & Zhang, Jack, 2021. "A Field Experiment on Business Opposition to the U.S.-China Trade War," SocArXiv 435u9, Center for Open Science.
    22. Pushan Dutt & Devashish Mitra, 2016. "Endogenous trade policy through majority voting: an empirical investigation," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Trade Policy Theory, Evidence and Applications, chapter 4, pages 67-93, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:19:y:2025:i:2:p:482-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.