IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v18y2024i4p1193-1209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How is reputation management by regulatory agencies related to their employees' reputational perception?

Author

Listed:
  • Mette Østergaard Pedersen
  • Koen Verhoest
  • Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen

Abstract

Existing research investigating regulatory agencies' reputation‐conscious behavior have primarily focused on reactive behavior in the context of reputational threats. Additionally, this literature has primarily focused on agencies' responses to such threats and external audiences' perceptions of agencies reputation, although reputation resides in both external and internal audiences. This study aims to address these two gaps by (1) identifying the relevance of regulatory agencies' reputations vis‐à‐vis internal audiences and (2) investigating whether reputations, in this case as judged by internal audiences, can be cultivated when managers of regulatory agencies perform reputation management in a more proactive sense. Using a unique two‐wave panel survey targeting internal audiences from three Danish regulatory agencies, we find a positive and significant relationship between reputation management and how internal audiences perceive the organizational reputation. Moreover, we find that employee advocacy partially mediates this relationship. Given that regulatory agencies are particularly susceptible to reputational threats and given that the reputational perception of employees affect other employee outcomes as well as their regulatory decision making, this study shows the potential of reputation management by regulatory agencies as an instrument for affecting employees' outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mette Østergaard Pedersen & Koen Verhoest & Heidi Houlberg Salomonsen, 2024. "How is reputation management by regulatory agencies related to their employees' reputational perception?," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 1193-1209, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:1193-1209
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12574
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12574?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:1193-1209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.