IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/reggov/v18y2024i4p1132-1152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering compliance with voluntary sustainability standards through institutional design: An analytic framework and empirical application

Author

Listed:
  • Charline Depoorter
  • Axel Marx

Abstract

The institutional design of voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) has been recognized as an important determinant of compliance with VSS rules, which partly explains heterogeneity in VSS sustainability impacts. However, the current understanding of how VSS institutional design generates compliance is scattered and lacks systematic operationalization. This paper brings together different strands of literature and identifies three main mechanisms through which VSS institutional design can generate compliance: enforcement, market incentives, and capacity‐building. We propose an integrated analytic framework that operationalizes these mechanisms into specific, identifiable design attributes. We apply it in an empirical analysis of 13 agrifood and forestry VSS to assess the extent to which these mechanisms are used in VSS institutional design. While enforcement appears necessary for VSS to operate, we find heterogeneity in how these mechanisms are used and combine, which is partly explained by contextual factors. This provides avenues for analyzing their respective effectiveness in generating compliance.

Suggested Citation

  • Charline Depoorter & Axel Marx, 2024. "Fostering compliance with voluntary sustainability standards through institutional design: An analytic framework and empirical application," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 1132-1152, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:1132-1152
    DOI: 10.1111/rego.12573
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12573
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/rego.12573?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:reggov:v:18:y:2024:i:4:p:1132-1152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1748-5991 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.