IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/quante/v17y2026i2p497-540.html

Conditional choice probability estimation with an imperfectly measured latent state

Author

Listed:
  • Yujung Hwang

Abstract

Traditional dynamic discrete choice model—Conditional Choice Probability estimator (DDCM‐CCP) literature considered identification using the likelihood of longitudinal choice only. However, such an approach has a limitation in identifying flexible dynamics for latent state due to the discrete and typically small‐dimensional nature of choice. This paper extends this literature to utilize imperfect measurements, called proxies, for a latent discrete state. I first show that proxies improve identification and discuss how survey design on proxies affects identification conditions. I then extend the estimator from Arcidiacono and Miller (2011) to pool information from an unbalanced panel of noisy proxies, enabling estimation of more flexible latent state dynamics than Markov chains. As an application, I estimate a dynamic model of labor supply and mental health, where dynamic mental health only imperfectly observed—plays a central role. The results reveal more complex dynamics than a standard Markov chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Yujung Hwang, 2026. "Conditional choice probability estimation with an imperfectly measured latent state," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), pages 497-540, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:497-540
    DOI: 10.3982/QE1894
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3982/QE1894
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3982/QE1894?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:quante:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:497-540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.