IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v37y2026i4p778-803.html

Integrating SfM, LiDAR and TLS for High‐Resolution Monitoring of Palsa Surface Changes and Degradation Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Störmer
  • Timo Kumpula
  • Pasi Korpelainen
  • Benjamin Burkhard

Abstract

Understanding fine‐scale surface changes is crucial for quantifying ecosystem dynamics and detecting landscape changes. Palsas, comparably small peatland elevations with an ice‐rich permafrost core, undergo natural cycles of growth and degradation. They can also serve as indicators of climate change in subarctic regions. Because they typically cover an area of only a few hundred square metres at most, satellite remote sensing is insufficient for monitoring their detailed development. Unoccupied aerial systems (UAS) and ground‐based remote sensing provide the necessary spatial resolution, and combining multiple sensor types can further improve data quality. In this study, we monitored the annual surface changes of two degrading palsas in northern Finnish Lapland from 2022 to 2024. We captured UAS RGB‐based structure‐from‐motion (SfM), UAS LiDAR and terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) point clouds and validated the resulting digital terrain models (DTMs) using RTK‐GNSS reference measurements. Active layer thickness (ALT) was measured at each GNSS point to characterize thaw depth and to delineate an ALT‐constrained frozen extent. Based on the DTMs, we quantified changes in palsa area, mean height, and volume above a predefined palsa base. These DTM‐based metrics were evaluated for the entire palsa surface and, separately, for the part of the palsa where ALT measurements indicated the presence of a remaining frozen core. The accuracy assessment shows clear advantages of merging SfM point clouds with LiDAR‐ or TLS‐derived datasets. The highest accuracy was achieved at the smaller and flatter palsa, suggesting that high point cloud density and low surface complexity increase accuracy. UAS LiDAR showed a consistent positive elevation bias, likely reflecting a combination of slope‐ and footprint‐related effects and limited penetration of moist moss and peat surfaces. Both palsas lost volume, area and average height during the study period. The larger palsa decreased in total volume by 20% across its entire extent and by 23% within the ALT‐constrained frozen extent; the smaller palsa lost 13% and 18%, respectively. These results underscore the acceleration of palsa degradation under current climatic conditions and demonstrate that multisensor approaches significantly improve high‐resolution monitoring of palsa surface change in permafrost landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Störmer & Timo Kumpula & Pasi Korpelainen & Benjamin Burkhard, 2026. "Integrating SfM, LiDAR and TLS for High‐Resolution Monitoring of Palsa Surface Changes and Degradation Dynamics," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 778-803, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:37:y:2026:i:4:p:778-803
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.70060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.70060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.70060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:37:y:2026:i:4:p:778-803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.