IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/perpro/v28y2017i1p42-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Sampling Design in the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring Programme

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Fagan
  • Frederick E. Nelson

Abstract

Prior to development of the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring (CALM) programme, little attention was paid to formal spatial sampling designs for measuring active‐layer thickness (ALT). This omission made the accuracy of many data‐sets questionable, in part because spatial periodicities caused by landscape features such as ice‐wedge polygons and thaw lakes can significantly influence the depth of thaw. Early in the development of CALM's protocols, ALT was sampled in the continuous permafrost zone in northern Alaska and simulated by computer, to determine how ALT could be measured accurately. The simulated and field data‐sets were analysed by comparing the means, variances and frequency distributions obtained using four spatial sampling designs (random, systematic, systematic random and systematic stratified unaligned). By a small margin, systematic stratified unaligned sampling provided the most accurate results. Systematic designs can, however, provide adequate estimates of the statistical moments of ALT with significant savings in cost, time and ease of implementation. Based on these results, the CALM programme recommended use of 10 x 10, 100 x 100 or 1000 x 1000 m grids, with sampling intervals of 1, 10 and 100 m, respectively. Most probed CALM sites now employ this strategy, except in terrain with unusual landscape elements or other special constraints. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Fagan & Frederick E. Nelson, 2017. "Spatial Sampling Design in the Circumpolar Active Layer Monitoring Programme," Permafrost and Periglacial Processes, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1), pages 42-51, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:28:y:2017:i:1:p:42-51
    DOI: 10.1002/ppp.1904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.1904
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ppp.1904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:perpro:v:28:y:2017:i:1:p:42-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1530 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.