IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i4p1030-1037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with childhood vaccine hesitancy and measles vaccine hesitancy among healthcare students

Author

Listed:
  • Selda Yörük

Abstract

This study aims to determine the prevalence and causes of childhood vaccine and measles vaccine hesitancy and refusal among healthcare students in Turkey. The pool of this cross‐sectional study, which included 718 students, was made up of healthcare students from the Faculty of Health Sciences at Balikesir University (N = 960). It was determined that 10% of students surveyed were hesitant regarding childhood vaccines, while 11.8% were hesitant with regard to the measles vaccine, specifically. Many of the participants held the belief that chronic idiopathic diseases such as multiple sclerosis and autism are related to vaccines; they also believed that vaccines should not be mandatory. More alarming than this, however, was that in response to a question regarding the measles vaccine, many of the students responded that “I would not have my child vaccinated with the vaccines administered by the Ministry of Health if I had a child.” The findings revealed, overall, that the rates of childhood vaccine hesitancy and measles vaccine hesitancy are high among the healthcare students who were surveyed and that a high number of healthcare students hold negative attitudes that are related to rates of vaccine hesitancy.

Suggested Citation

  • Selda Yörük, 2020. "Factors associated with childhood vaccine hesitancy and measles vaccine hesitancy among healthcare students," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1030-1037, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:1030-1037
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12762
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:4:p:1030-1037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.