IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i3p620-628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positive psychological constructs and health behavior adherence in heart failure: A qualitative research study

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher M. Celano
  • Eleanor E. Beale
  • Melanie E. Freedman
  • Carol A. Mastromauro
  • Emily H. Feig
  • Elyse R. Park
  • Jeff C. Huffman

Abstract

Psychological well‐being may play an important role in health behavior adherence and cardiovascular health, but there has been limited study of well‐being in patients with heart failure. In this descriptive qualitative research study, we interviewed 30 patients with heart failure to explore their psychological experiences with heart failure and the perceived associations between positive psychological constructs and adherence to physical activity, diet, and medication recommendations. Interviews were transcribed, then coded in NVivo using directed and conventional content analysis, and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was applied to report our findings. Participants spontaneously reported positive psychological constructs both during an acute phase of illness and 3 months later. Participants most commonly experienced gratitude, acceptance, connectedness, and faith in the setting of heart failure. In contrast, pride, determination, and hope were identified most frequently as playing a role in health behavior adherence. Finally, participants reported a reinforcing relationship between positive constructs and health behavior engagement. These findings suggest that interventions to boost positive constructs have the potential to improve well‐being and health behavior adherence in patients with heart failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher M. Celano & Eleanor E. Beale & Melanie E. Freedman & Carol A. Mastromauro & Emily H. Feig & Elyse R. Park & Jeff C. Huffman, 2020. "Positive psychological constructs and health behavior adherence in heart failure: A qualitative research study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 620-628, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:620-628
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12704
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:620-628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.