IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v22y2020i3p602-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nursing students' motivation regulation strategies in blended learning: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Kati Mäenpää
  • Hanna Järvenoja
  • Jouni Peltonen
  • Kirsi Pyhältö

Abstract

Although there is a strong body of evidence showing that motivational factors are critical components of self‐regulated professional learning and commitment to work, little is known about nursing students' motivation regulation during their studies. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of nursing students' motivation regulation (MR) strategies and factors contributing to their reported use along their 3‐year study path in a blended learning environment. A purposeful sampling was used to select 12 undergraduate nursing students, who exhibited different MR profiles and had completed almost 3 years of study in a BL degree program. A qualitative, deductive, content analysis was used to depict students' experiences from their retrospective recollection in the interview situation. Seven motivation strategies were identified: environmental structuring, self‐consequating, goal‐oriented self‐talk, efficacy management, emotion regulation, regulation of value, and interest enhancement. Individual and situational factors were found to enhance and to sustain the use of appropriate MR strategies. The students exhibited versatility in their use of MR strategies, which were related to the study phase. These findings regarding nursing students' MR strategies should be considered in the development of nursing education programs and the implementation of improvements that contribute to professional and self‐regulated learning in BL programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Kati Mäenpää & Hanna Järvenoja & Jouni Peltonen & Kirsi Pyhältö, 2020. "Nursing students' motivation regulation strategies in blended learning: A qualitative study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 602-611, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:602-611
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12702
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferry Efendi & Anna Kurniati & Angeline Bushy & Joko Gunawan, 2019. "Concept analysis of nurse retention," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 422-427, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:22:y:2020:i:3:p:602-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.