IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v20y2018i4p502-508.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vital signs: Valid indicators to assess pain in intensive care unit patients? An observational, descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Sevilay Erden
  • Nevra Demir
  • Gulay A. Ugras
  • Umut Arslan
  • Sevban Arslan

Abstract

Pain is a stressor for intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and inadequate pain assessment has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality. One hundred and twenty patients were evaluated during three periods: (T1) 1 min before, (T2) during, and (T3) 20 min after the nociceptive procedure. For each patient, data were obtained through at least two nociceptive procedures. Conscious patients’ self‐reports of pain were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale and Visual Analog Scale. For unconscious patients, the Behavioral Pain Scale was used instead. Descriptive statistical methods, Friedman's test, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient were used for the data analysis. Significant changes were observed in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) during nociceptive procedures. The HR, RR, and pain scores increased, while the SpO2 decreased. Positive correlation coefficients were observed between the pain intensity and HR and RR levels. According to our study findings, vital signs are not strong indicators for pain assessment in neurosurgery ICU patients. However, HR and RR can be used as cues when behavioral indicators are not valid in these unconscious patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Sevilay Erden & Nevra Demir & Gulay A. Ugras & Umut Arslan & Sevban Arslan, 2018. "Vital signs: Valid indicators to assess pain in intensive care unit patients? An observational, descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 502-508, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:502-508
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12543
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12543?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:502-508. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.