IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v20y2018i3p283-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural factors influencing Japanese nurses’ assertive communication. Part 1: Collectivism

Author

Listed:
  • Mieko Omura
  • Teresa E. Stone
  • Tracy Levett‐Jones

Abstract

Culture influences the way health‐care professionals communicate with each other and their ability to relate to colleagues in an assertive manner. Cultural barriers can also make it difficult for nurses to speak up even when they have concerns about patient safety. An understanding of the potential impact of cultural factors is therefore needed when developing assertiveness communication training programs. This paper presents the findings from a study that explored Japanese nurses’ perceptions of how culture and values impact assertive communication in health care. Semistructured interviews with 23 registered nurses were undertaken, and data were analyzed using directed content analysis. Two major themes were identified: collectivism and hierarchy/power. In the present study, we discuss the cultural values related to collectivism that included four categories of “wa” (harmony), “uchi to soto” (inside and outside), implicit communication/ambiguity, and “nemawashi” (groundwork). The findings highlight the impact of culture on nurses’ assertive communication behaviors and can be used to inform the design of culturally‐appropriate assertiveness communication training programs for Japanese nurses working both within their own country or internationally.

Suggested Citation

  • Mieko Omura & Teresa E. Stone & Tracy Levett‐Jones, 2018. "Cultural factors influencing Japanese nurses’ assertive communication. Part 1: Collectivism," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), pages 283-288, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:283-288
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jack Pun & Engle Angela Chan & Manbo Man & Suanne Eggins & Diana Slade, 2019. "Pre‐ and post evaluations of the effects of the Connect, Ask, Respond and Empathise (CARE) protocol on nursing handover: A case study of a bilingual hospital in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3001-3011, August.
    2. Rosemary Ricciardelli & Matthew S. Johnston & Brittany Bennett & Andrea M. Stelnicki & R. Nicholas Carleton, 2022. "“It Is Difficult to Always Be an Antagonist”: Ethical, Professional, and Moral Dilemmas as Potentially Psychologically Traumatic Events among Nurses in Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Mieko Omura & Tracy Levett‐Jones & Teresa E. Stone, 2019. "Design and evaluation of an assertiveness communication training programme for nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1990-1998, May.
    4. Mario Alberto de la Puente Pacheco & Carlos Mario de Oro Aguado & Elkyn Lugo Arias & Heidy Rico & Diana Cifuentes, 2021. "Local Accreditation in Outpatient Care as an Alternative to Attract Foreign Patients to Colombian Medical Travel: A Case Study in the City of Barranquilla," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:283-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.