IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v20y2018i2p187-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of training on intensive care providers’ attitudes and knowledge regarding limitation of life‐support treatment and organ donation after circulatory death

Author

Listed:
  • Maria del Mar Lomero
  • María F. Jiménez‐Herrera
  • Mireia Llaurado‐Serra
  • María A. Bodí
  • Nuria Masnou
  • Eva Oliver
  • Alberto Sandiumenge

Abstract

The limitation of life‐sustaining treatment is common practice in critical care units, and organ donation after circulatory death has come to be included as an option within this care plan. Lack of knowledge and misunderstandings can raise barriers between health‐care providers (e.g., confusion about professional roles, lack of collaboration, doubts about the legality of the process, and not respecting patients' wishes in the decision‐making process). The aim of the present study was to determine the knowledge and attitudes of intensive care physicians and nurses before and after a multidisciplinary online training program. A cross‐sectional study was performed, and comparisons between the two groups were made using a χ2‐test for categorical data and unpaired t‐test or Mann–Whitney rank sum test for continuous data according to its distribution. Training benefited both professional categories, helping nurses to be more open‐minded and willing to collaborate, while physicians became more aware of nurses' presence and the need to collaborate with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria del Mar Lomero & María F. Jiménez‐Herrera & Mireia Llaurado‐Serra & María A. Bodí & Nuria Masnou & Eva Oliver & Alberto Sandiumenge, 2018. "Impact of training on intensive care providers’ attitudes and knowledge regarding limitation of life‐support treatment and organ donation after circulatory death," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 187-196, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:2:p:187-196
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12400
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12400?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:20:y:2018:i:2:p:187-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.