IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v18y2016i4p425-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the incivility in nursing education‐revised (INE‐R) survey

Author

Listed:
  • Jennie C. De Gagne
  • Hee Sun Kang
  • Myung Sun Hyun

Abstract

In this study, we developed and tested the psychometric properties of a translated and culturally adapted Korean version of the Incivility in Nursing Education‐Revised (INE‐R) survey. Using a cross‐sectional design, the INE‐R was administered to a convenience sample of 284 students enrolled in three Korean nursing colleges. Descriptive statistics were calculated for 24 student and 24 faculty incivility behavior items. Underlying factor structure was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and model fit was assessed using chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit and other fit indices. For student incivility items, a four‐factor model provided the best fit for the data, while a two‐factor model provided the best fit for faculty incivility items. Overall reliability of the INE‐R for student and faculty incivility behavior was estimated as α = 0.94 and 0.96, respectively. The Korean version of the INE‐R is a reliable measure for assessing perceptions of student and faculty incivility among Korean nursing students.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennie C. De Gagne & Hee Sun Kang & Myung Sun Hyun, 2016. "Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the incivility in nursing education‐revised (INE‐R) survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(4), pages 425-434, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:4:p:425-434
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12285
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:18:y:2016:i:4:p:425-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.