IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v15y2013i4p525-533.html

The experiences of adult ventilator‐dependent patients: A meta‐synthesis review

Author

Listed:
  • Shwu‐Feng Tsay
  • Pei‐Fan Mu
  • Shirling Lin
  • Kai‐Wei Katherine Wang
  • Yu‐Chih Chen

Abstract

Studies exploring the perceptions of patients whose lives are maintained by mechanical ventilation highlight the stressful nature of this type of experience. The objective of this meta‐synthesis study was to describe the nature of the experience of adult ventilator‐dependent patients. A systematic literature search of English and Chinese databases was undertaken, covering the period between 1970 and 2012. Qualitative research findings were extracted and pooled using the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument. A total of 1004 papers were identified from various database and hand searches. Nineteen papers were critically appraised and 16 met inclusion criteria. Five meta‐synthesis themes emerged from the analysis: (1) the feelings of fear due to being dependent on a ventilator and the loss of control of life; (2) disconnection with reality; (3) impaired embodiment; (4) construction of coping patterns; (5) trust and caring relationship. Suggested implications for practice include enhancing the trust relationship with health professionals, as well as nursing actions throughout the suction procedure relating to release of patient's psychological distress and empowering their resilience factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Shwu‐Feng Tsay & Pei‐Fan Mu & Shirling Lin & Kai‐Wei Katherine Wang & Yu‐Chih Chen, 2013. "The experiences of adult ventilator‐dependent patients: A meta‐synthesis review," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 525-533, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:525-533
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:4:p:525-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.