IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v15y2013i3p318-325.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Informed decision making regarding antenatal screening for fetal abnormality in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study of parents and professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Owen Barr
  • Heather Skirton

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the views of parents and health professionals regarding informed decision making for antenatal screening for Down syndrome. This qualitative study was based on thematic analysis and conducted in England, where screening for Down syndrome is universally offered to all pregnant women. Four focus groups were held with pregnant women and/or their partners (n = 22), and another four groups were held with health professionals who offer antenatal screening (n = 22). Data were analyzed through coding of the transcribed focus group discussions and extraction of main themes. Extracted themes were: information overload, gaps in information, challenges in providing information and involvement of both parents in the decision. Parents and professionals believed that burdening parents with untimely information on a wide range of topics in the first trimester detracted from decision making about screening. Many parents also reported they were not sufficiently informed and wanted individualized discussion with a health professional. To ensure parents make informed decisions, information on screening should be provided at the appropriate time, with opportunity for personal discussion with a knowledgeable health professional.

Suggested Citation

  • Owen Barr & Heather Skirton, 2013. "Informed decision making regarding antenatal screening for fetal abnormality in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study of parents and professionals," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 318-325, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:318-325
    DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12034
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/nhs.12034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Craig Lockwood & Raluca Sfetcu, 2020. "Ethics in quality improvement: Reimagining the clinician role," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3), pages 483-485, September.
    2. Kyoko Murakami & Sue Turale & Heather Skirton & Faye Doris & Kumiko Tsujino & Misae Ito & Saeko Kutsunugi, 2016. "Experiences regarding maternal age‐specific risks and prenatal testing of women of advanced maternal age in Japan," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 8-14, March.
    3. Memnun Seven & Aygül Akyüz & Kafiye Eroglu & Sandra Daack‐Hirsch & Heather Skirton, 2017. "Women's knowledge and use of prenatal screening tests," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(13-14), pages 1869-1877, July.
    4. Memnun Seven & Kafiye Eroglu & Aygül Akyüz & Charlotta Ingvoldstad, 2017. "Educational needs of nurses to provide genetic services in prenatal care: A cross‐sectional study from Turkey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 294-300, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:15:y:2013:i:3:p:318-325. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.