IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v14y2012i4p488-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnographic study of a good death among elderly Japanese Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Keiko Hattori
  • Dianne N. Ishida

Abstract

Most humans desire a good death, but the nursing literature on culture‐specific responses to older life, especially on issues of death and dying among Japanese Americans, is still limited. The pattern of beliefs about a good death held by elderly Japanese Americans living in Hawaii was explored. A qualitative study using ethnography and in‐depth interviewing was employed. Eighteen healthy and active elderly participants were interviewed, and data analyzed using ethnography to extract categories and themes, and four supplementary interviews with experts were held for triangulation of the data. Four themes emerged, however, in this paper, the predominate one, not being a burden to family, was discussed. The participants believed burdening someone in their culture has an extremely negative implication. Sufficient preparation for older life and death, family support, friends support, and finance were their strategies to avoid being a burden. Nurses need to understand that the concept of good death is unique to every culture. Such knowledge will help them to plan and provide appropriate end‐of‐life care, and will reduce the risk of living wills being ignored.

Suggested Citation

  • Keiko Hattori & Dianne N. Ishida, 2012. "Ethnographic study of a good death among elderly Japanese Americans," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 488-494, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:14:y:2012:i:4:p:488-494
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00725.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00725.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00725.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:14:y:2012:i:4:p:488-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.