IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/nuhsci/v14y2012i3p405-411.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consistency analysis of parenting styles in Thailand during children's first year

Author

Listed:
  • Rutja Phuphaibul
  • Jariya Wittayasooporn
  • Chanpen Choprapawon

Abstract

This descriptive study identifies and examines the consistency of parenting styles during the first year of their children's lives. The data were collected from interviewing 4088 parents or primary care takers of the 6 month old infants during the third wave of data collection of The Prospective Cohort of Thai Children project. The instrument used was the Infant Parenting Styles Questionnaire, developed by the researchers, which reflected parental responses to infant care in five different situations. After the answers were categorized into controlling, reasoning, overprotection, and neglectful parenting styles, the weighted kappa was used for the consistency analysis. The findings revealed that during the first 6 months of life, the overprotection style was the most common, followed by the reasoning style. The controlling and neglectful styles were very seldom used. The consistency of the parental styles in the same care givers using the kappa values showed that agreement between each of the styles was very low (−0.0419 to 0.0688). This suggests that parenting styles during the first year of life seem to occur in random patterns.

Suggested Citation

  • Rutja Phuphaibul & Jariya Wittayasooporn & Chanpen Choprapawon, 2012. "Consistency analysis of parenting styles in Thailand during children's first year," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 405-411, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:405-411
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00720.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00720.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00720.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:14:y:2012:i:3:p:405-411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1442-2018 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.