IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v48y2001i8p710-721.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Many‐player rendezvous search: Stick together or split and meet?

Author

Listed:
  • L.C. Thomas
  • M. Pikounis

Abstract

Rendezvous search finds the strategies that players should use in order to find one another when they are separated in a region. Previous papers have concentrated on the case where there are two players searching for one another. This paper looks at the problem when there are more than two players and concentrates on what they should do if some but not all of them meet together. It looks at two strategies—the stick together one and the split up and meet again one. This paper shows that the former is optimal among the class of strategies which require no memory and are stationary, and it gives a method of calculating the expected rendezvous time under it. However, simulation results comparing both strategies suggest that in most situations the split up and meet again strategy which requires some memory leads to faster expected rendezvous times. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 48:710–721, 2001

Suggested Citation

  • L.C. Thomas & M. Pikounis, 2001. "Many‐player rendezvous search: Stick together or split and meet?," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(8), pages 710-721, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:48:y:2001:i:8:p:710-721
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.1043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.1043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.1043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei Shi Lim & Steve Alpern & Anatole Beck, 1997. "Rendezvous Search on the Line with More Than Two Players," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 357-364, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiaoming Han & Donglei Du & Juan Vera & Luis F. Zuluaga, 2008. "Improved Bounds for the Symmetric Rendezvous Value on the Line," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 772-782, June.
    2. Steve Alpern & Anatole Beck, 1999. "Asymmetric Rendezvous on the Line Is a Double Linear Search Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 604-618, August.
    3. Edward J. Anderson & Sándor P. Fekete, 2001. "Two Dimensional Rendezvous Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 107-118, February.
    4. Steve Alpern & Anatole Beck, 2000. "Pure Strategy Asymmetric Rendezvous on the Line with an Unknown Initial Distance," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 498-501, June.
    5. Vic Baston, 1999. "Note: Two rendezvous search problems on the line," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 335-340, April.
    6. Steve Alpern & Wei Shi Lim, 2002. "Rendezvous of three agents on the line," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(3), pages 244-255, April.
    7. Steve Alpern & Anatole Beck, 1999. "Rendezvous Search on the Line with Limited Resources: Maximizing the Probability of Meeting," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(6), pages 849-861, December.
    8. Steve Alpern, 2002. "Rendezvous Search: A Personal Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 772-795, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:48:y:2001:i:8:p:710-721. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.