IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v23y1976i3p513-523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of several attribute sampling plans

Author

Listed:
  • Alan E. Gelfand

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine several types of procedures for attribute sampling inspection‐the widely used Military Standard 105D plans [8], the lesser known Double Zero plans as developed by Ellis [4] and the Narrow Limit gaging plans of Ott and Mundel [9]. Each of the procedures is described with an effort made to illuminate their more subtle features. Then the plans are compared, whence it is revealed that (i) Narrow Limit gaging plans have a serious weakness in comparison to the others and (ii) Double Zero plans tend to be essentially conservative, but that sufficiently tight Military Standard 105D plans can be selected to achieve comparable performance in all ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan E. Gelfand, 1976. "A comparison of several attribute sampling plans," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 513-523, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:23:y:1976:i:3:p:513-523
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800230312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800230312
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800230312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:23:y:1976:i:3:p:513-523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.