IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v22y1975i4p721-739.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A game theoretic approach to a two firm bidding problem

Author

Listed:
  • W. D. Cook
  • M. J. L. Kirby
  • S. L. Mehndiratta

Abstract

In this paper a model is developed for determining optimal strategies for two competing firms which are about to submit sealed tender bids on K contracts. A contract calls for the winning firm to supply a specific amount of a commodity at the bid price. By the same token, the production of that commodity involves various amounts of N different resources which each firm possesses in limited quantities. It is assumed that the same two firms bid on each contract and that each wants to determine a bidding strategy which will maximize its profits subject to the constraint that the firm must be able to produce the amount of products required to meet the contracts it wins. This bidding model is formulated as a sequence of bimatrix games coupled together by N resource constraints. Since the firms' strategy spaces are intertwined, the usual quadratic programming methods cannot be used to determine equilibrium strategies. In lieu of this a number of theorems are given which partially characterize such strategies. For the single resource problem techniques are developed for determining equilibrium strategies. In the multiple resource problem similar methods yield subequilibrium strategies or strategies that are equilibrium from at least one firm's point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • W. D. Cook & M. J. L. Kirby & S. L. Mehndiratta, 1975. "A game theoretic approach to a two firm bidding problem," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 721-739, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:22:y:1975:i:4:p:721-739
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800220408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800220408
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800220408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:22:y:1975:i:4:p:721-739. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.