IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v22y1975i4p667-679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis of the long range operating characteristics of the MIL‐STD‐105D sampling scheme and some suggested modifications

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald G. Brown
  • Herbert C. Rutemiller

Abstract

An integral part of the MIL–STD–105D scheme for sampling inspection by attributes is the transfer from normal inspection to reduced or tightened inspection when the historical record of inspected lots suggests unusually good or bad quality. The switching rules in MIL–STD–105D have been criticized, especially by Japanese manufacturers, as being too severe when what is defined as acceptable quality material is submitted. This paper examines the long range fraction of lots rejected for several MIL–STD–105D sampling plans by using the MIL–STD–105D switching rules, using a modification suggested by the Japanese Standards Association, and by using a second modification developed by the authors. The Japanese Standards Association switching rules are more complex than those in MIL–STD–105D. It is demonstrated that they lead to improved long–range properties for Normal–Tightened–Reduced schemes, but to poorer properties for Normal–Tightened schemes. A simplified set of switching rules is suggested, wherein the “limit numbers” in MIL–STD–105D are eliminated. In comparison to MIL–STD–105D, the simpler rules lead to a lower probability of rejection for good lots and a comparable probability of rejection for bad lots.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald G. Brown & Herbert C. Rutemiller, 1975. "An analysis of the long range operating characteristics of the MIL‐STD‐105D sampling scheme and some suggested modifications," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 667-679, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:22:y:1975:i:4:p:667-679
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800220404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800220404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800220404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:22:y:1975:i:4:p:667-679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.