IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navlog/v20y1973i4p673-697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Target selection in Lanchester combat: Linear‐law attrition process

Author

Listed:
  • James G. Taylor

Abstract

We develop the solution to a simple problem of target selection in Lanchester combat against two enemy force types each of which undergoes a “linear‐law” attrition process. In addition to the Pontryagin maximum principle, the theory of singular extremals is required to solve this problem. Our major contribution is to show how to synthesize the optimal target selection policies from the basic optimality conditions. This solution synthesis methodology is applicable to more general dynamic (tactical) allocation problems. For constant attrition‐rate coefficients we show that whether or not changes can occur in target priorities depends solely on how survivors are valued and is independent of the type of attrition process.

Suggested Citation

  • James G. Taylor, 1973. "Target selection in Lanchester combat: Linear‐law attrition process," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 673-697, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:4:p:673-697
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800200408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800200408
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.3800200408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. N. Cangiotti & M. Capolli & M. Sensi, 2023. "A generalization of unaimed fire Lanchester’s model in multi-battle warfare," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navlog:v:20:y:1973:i:4:p:673-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1931-9193 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.